Add vercel speed insights

[Adnanmd76]

No description provided.

[codesandbox]

Review or Edit in CodeSandbox

Open the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders

Open Preview

[bolt-new-by-stackblitz]

Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
clarity-vault2026	Error			Oct 16, 2025 6:36am

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Adnanmd76, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on a comprehensive rebranding of the project, changing its name from 'Wallet UI' to 'ClarityVault2026' across all documentation and configuration files. Concurrently, it integrates Vercel Speed Insights to provide valuable performance monitoring capabilities, aiming to enhance the application's speed and user experience.

Highlights

• Project Renaming: The project name has been consistently updated from 'Wallet UI' to 'ClarityVault2026' across all relevant documentation files and package configurations, reflecting a significant rebranding effort.
• Vercel Speed Insights Integration: The @vercel/speed-insights package has been added as a dependency and integrated into the main App.js component, enabling performance monitoring and optimization for the application.
• Dependency and Configuration Updates: The package.json and package-lock.json files were updated to include the new Vercel dependency and reflect the project's new name. Minor formatting adjustments were also made to package.json.
• Documentation Alignment: GitHub Actions badge URLs in ci-status.md have been updated to correctly point to the ClarityVault2026 repository, ensuring consistency with the new project name.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces Vercel Speed Insights for performance monitoring and also applies a project-wide rename from 'Wallet UI' to 'ClarityVault2026'. The changes are generally well-implemented. The addition of Speed Insights follows standard practice, and the renaming is consistent across the updated files. I've added one comment regarding the hardcoded username in the CI status badge URLs, which could be a maintainability concern if the repository is forked or moved. For future pull requests, it would be beneficial to separate distinct concerns like adding a new feature and project-wide refactoring into separate PRs for clearer review history.