Skip to content

Conversation

@stark-cybertech
Copy link
Collaborator

@stark-cybertech stark-cybertech commented Jun 29, 2025

Type of Change

  • πŸ› Bug fix
  • ✨ New feature
  • ♻️ Code refactor
  • πŸ“ Documentation update
  • πŸš€ Performance improvement
  • βœ… Test addition/update
  • 🧹 Chore/maintenance
  • πŸ“ API Spec update
  • Other (please describe):

Changes

  • initial implementation for User-Service classes
  • update API to v2.1.1 (add 500 responses)
  • add JUnit tests automated with GitHub actions (see Feature/user service testsΒ #62)

Checklist

  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have updated the API spec to reflect any changes my code makes

Related Issues

Closes #40

Additional Notes

@stark-cybertech
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Resolved the Merge conflict

@stark-cybertech
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Merged branch with JUnit tests.

@stark-cybertech stark-cybertech merged commit ab1c0ad into main Jul 2, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create basic implementation of User Microservice

2 participants