Skip to content

Code generation: update services and models #1536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot commented Jul 31, 2025

OpenAPI spec files or templates have been modified on 14-08-2025 by commit.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2025 20:27
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request contains an automated update to the SDK's services and models, ensuring alignment with the latest OpenAPI specifications. The changes primarily involve standardizing error handling models across various API services, enhancing existing type definitions with new imports, and applying minor stylistic and structural refinements to the generated code.

Highlights

  • API Error Model Standardization: Standardized the import of ServiceError, RestServiceError, or DefaultErrorResponseEntity across numerous API service files to reflect updated error handling models.
  • Enhanced Type Definitions: Introduced new type imports (SettingType, Target, ResourceType) in various model definitions, enhancing the clarity and completeness of the SDK's data structures.
  • Code Generation Refinements: Applied minor stylistic changes, such as updating string literal quotes in method signatures, and adjusted model discrimination logic in transferWebhooks for improved consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces updates to services and models, primarily focusing on adding error type imports and stylistic consistency. A critical issue was identified in src/typings/transferWebhooks/transferDataTracking.ts concerning the removal of the discriminator mapping, which has been flagged for immediate attention.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 11 times, most recently from fa0e9c9 to 0472784 Compare August 6, 2025 07:40
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 6, 2025

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/models branch 13 times, most recently from 92da405 to 4c89651 Compare August 13, 2025 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants