Skip to content

Comments

[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#419

Open
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/balanceplatform
Open

[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#419
AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sdk-automation/balanceplatform

Conversation

@AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR contains the automated changes for the balanceplatform service.

The commit history of this PR reflects the adyen-openapi commits that have been applied.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2026 21:46
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers an automated update to the balanceplatform service, incorporating new API functionalities. The primary change involves extending the AccountHoldersApi to support retrieving tax form summaries, ensuring the client library remains synchronized with the latest API specifications.

Highlights

  • API Update: A new get_tax_form_summary method has been added to the AccountHoldersApi to retrieve tax form summaries for account holders.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • Adyen/services/balancePlatform/account_holders_api.py
    • Added get_tax_form_summary method to retrieve tax form summaries for account holders.
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically generated by AdyenAutomationBot to update services and models based on recent adyen-openapi commits.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds the get_tax_form_summary method to the AccountHoldersApi class, which appears to be an auto-generated change. The implementation is consistent with the existing API methods. While the code itself seems correct, I've noted the absence of corresponding unit tests for this new functionality. It's highly recommended to add tests to ensure correctness and prevent future regressions. I've also left one minor suggestion regarding a parameter name to improve code clarity, which may be addressable via the generator configuration.

method = "GET"
return self.client.call_adyen_api(None, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs)

def get_tax_form_summary(self, id, idempotency_key=None, **kwargs):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The parameter name id shadows the Python built-in id(). While this is consistent with other methods in this auto-generated file, it's a good practice to avoid shadowing built-ins to improve clarity and prevent potential issues. If possible, consider using a more descriptive name like account_holder_id, which might require a change in the OpenAPI generator configuration.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant