[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#419
[balanceplatform] Code generation: update services and models#419AdyenAutomationBot wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request delivers an automated update to the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds the get_tax_form_summary method to the AccountHoldersApi class, which appears to be an auto-generated change. The implementation is consistent with the existing API methods. While the code itself seems correct, I've noted the absence of corresponding unit tests for this new functionality. It's highly recommended to add tests to ensure correctness and prevent future regressions. I've also left one minor suggestion regarding a parameter name to improve code clarity, which may be addressable via the generator configuration.
| method = "GET" | ||
| return self.client.call_adyen_api(None, self.service, method, endpoint, idempotency_key, **kwargs) | ||
|
|
||
| def get_tax_form_summary(self, id, idempotency_key=None, **kwargs): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The parameter name id shadows the Python built-in id(). While this is consistent with other methods in this auto-generated file, it's a good practice to avoid shadowing built-ins to improve clarity and prevent potential issues. If possible, consider using a more descriptive name like account_holder_id, which might require a change in the OpenAPI generator configuration.



This PR contains the automated changes for the
balanceplatformservice.The commit history of this PR reflects the
adyen-openapicommits that have been applied.