Add migration script for partitioning table trace_log#678
Merged
Conversation
eskebab
force-pushed
the
feature/659-create-partitioning
branch
from
bb1ffba to
e4ebfe0
Compare
src/Events/Migration/FunctionsAndProcedures/createlogspartition.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
eskebab
force-pushed
the
feature/659-create-partitioning
branch
from
e4ebfe0 to
adc1149
Compare
eskebab
force-pushed
the
feature/659-create-partitioning
branch
from
e123f4b to
7677146
Compare
eskebab
force-pushed
the
feature/659-create-partitioning
branch
from
7677146 to
bf9a245
Compare
|
SandGrainOne
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Related Issue(s)
Verification
Documentation
Following these guidelines for creating a partitioned table:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-partitioning.html
see comments in issue #659 regarding how this was tested