Skip to content

test: use external js-reactivity-benchmark package#153

Open
divdavem wants to merge 1 commit intoAmadeusITGroup:masterfrom
divdavem:externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks
Open

test: use external js-reactivity-benchmark package#153
divdavem wants to merge 1 commit intoAmadeusITGroup:masterfrom
divdavem:externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks

Conversation

@divdavem
Copy link
Member

@divdavem divdavem commented Feb 27, 2025

Cf similar usage of js-reactivity-benchmark in this PR on signal-polyfill

@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks branch from f82a0f7 to feb8fdb Compare February 27, 2025 10:18
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (abfdc0d) to head (b44e5c6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #153   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines          889       889           
  Branches       133       133           
=========================================
  Hits           889       889           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks branch from feb8fdb to a161b60 Compare February 27, 2025 10:23
@divdavem divdavem marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 10:29
@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks branch 4 times, most recently from 82a63e3 to e83d672 Compare March 4, 2025 14:11
@divdavem divdavem force-pushed the externalizeJsReactivityBenchmarks branch from e83d672 to b44e5c6 Compare March 4, 2025 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant