[WIP] Update and refine week 3 content for product analytics #4
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Week 3 Content Review and Enhancement Plan
Acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics, I will review, plan, create, refine and update all Week 3 content (Days 15-21).
Progress Checklist
Phase 1: Assessment (Completed)
Phase 2: Content Creation (Pending)
Phase 3: Supporting Materials (Pending)
Key Insights from Assessment:
Original prompt
review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as an subhect mater expert in product analytics for week 3
The user has attached the following files from their workspace:
- 30-Day Product Analytics Masterclass.md
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with a request to review a 30-day syllabus and update bash files accordingly. The user then requested a detailed updated layout of the project. Following that, the user attempted to run a script to copy curriculum and reports, which resulted in multiple errors indicating that certain files could not be found. The user continued to execute commands to run the script, encountering the same errors. The user inquired about the usage of specific folders and requested a full review of the codebase to identify unnecessary files and raise issues on GitHub. The user then asked to create detailed issues on GitHub, followed by a request to create issues one at a time. The conversation shifted towards reviewing and updating content for weeks 2 and 3 of the project.][Intent Mapping:
[Technical Inventory:
build_book.shto manage project files.[Code Archaeology:
build_book.sh: The script is intended to copy curriculum and reports but fails due to missing files.main_curriculum.md,ab_test_analysis.md,qbr_presentation.md, etc., indicating a need for file verification.][Progress Assessment:
[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is captured, including user requests for reviews, updates, and issue creation.]
[Recent Commands Analysis:
chmod +x ./scripts/build_book.sh./scripts/build_book.sh1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "review the 30 day syllabus and update the bash files accordingly" - "create a detailed updated layout of the project" - "Run chmod +x ./scripts/build_book.sh" - "is the content folder used?" - "to a full review of the code base, and flag and identify files no longer needed." - "create the issues on github, providing extrema details." - "create the issues one at a time" - "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 2" - "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 3" - Session Context: The conversation has focused on reviewing and updating project files, executing scripts, and planning content for upcoming weeks. - User Intent Evolution: The user has shifted from executing scripts and managing files to a more strategic focus on content review and issue management.- Technical Foundation:
- Bash Scrip...
Created from VS Code via the GitHub Pull Request extension.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.