Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Nov 13, 2025

Week 3 Content Review and Enhancement Plan

Acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics, I will review, plan, create, refine and update all Week 3 content (Days 15-21).

Progress Checklist

Phase 1: Assessment (Completed)

  • Review the 30-Day syllabus to understand Week 3 objectives
  • Examine current Week 3 markdown files (currently minimal placeholders)
  • Understand the content structure and format from Week 1 examples
  • Identify all Week 3 deliverables needed

Phase 2: Content Creation (Pending)

  • Day 15: The Definitive A/B Test Readout - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 16: The Quasi-Experiment Post-Mortem - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 17: Cannibalization vs. Creation – The Engagement Portfolio - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 18: Retention Curves & The Lift Over Time - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 19: Validating the Engagement Loop - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 20: Predictive Modeling for Proactive Engagement - Create comprehensive content
  • Day 21: The One-Slide Story - Create comprehensive content

Phase 3: Supporting Materials (Pending)

  • Update/create Week 3 challenge notebooks
  • Update/create Week 3 solution notebooks
  • Ensure consistency with Week 3 curriculum objectives

Key Insights from Assessment:

  • Week 3 focuses on "The Deep Dive – Causal Impact and Strategic Value"
  • Current files are minimal placeholders
  • Need to create detailed, educational content similar to Day 01 structure
  • Content must bridge from Week 2's monitoring/triage to Week 4's strategy
Original prompt

review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as an subhect mater expert in product analytics for week 3

The user has attached the following files from their workspace:

  • 30-Day Product Analytics Masterclass.md
[Chronological Review: The conversation began with a request to review a 30-day syllabus and update bash files accordingly. The user then requested a detailed updated layout of the project. Following that, the user attempted to run a script to copy curriculum and reports, which resulted in multiple errors indicating that certain files could not be found. The user continued to execute commands to run the script, encountering the same errors. The user inquired about the usage of specific folders and requested a full review of the codebase to identify unnecessary files and raise issues on GitHub. The user then asked to create detailed issues on GitHub, followed by a request to create issues one at a time. The conversation shifted towards reviewing and updating content for weeks 2 and 3 of the project.]

[Intent Mapping:

  1. "review the 30 day syllabus and update the bash files accordingly" - User wants to ensure the bash files reflect the syllabus.
  2. "create a detailed updated layout of the project" - User seeks an organized structure for the project.
  3. "Run chmod +x ./scripts/build_book.sh" - User attempts to execute a script but encounters errors due to missing files.
  4. "is the content folder used?" - User questions the relevance of a specific folder.
  5. "to a full review of the code base, and flag and identify files no longer needed." - User wants to clean up the codebase.
  6. "create the issues on github, providing extrema details." - User requests detailed issue creation on GitHub.
  7. "create the issues one at a time" - User prefers a step-by-step approach to issue creation.
  8. "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 2" - User seeks expert-level content review and updates for week 2.
  9. "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 3" - User requests similar expert review for week 3.]

[Technical Inventory:

  • Bash scripts: The user is working with build_book.sh to manage project files.
  • GitHub: User intends to create issues for project management.
  • Content folders: User is assessing the relevance of specific folders in the project structure.]

[Code Archaeology:

  • build_book.sh: The script is intended to copy curriculum and reports but fails due to missing files.
  • Files mentioned in errors: main_curriculum.md, ab_test_analysis.md, qbr_presentation.md, etc., indicating a need for file verification.]

[Progress Assessment:

  • Completed Tasks: User has attempted to run the build script and has engaged in planning for weeks 2 and 3.
  • Partially Complete Work: User is in the process of reviewing the codebase and creating GitHub issues.
  • Validated Outcomes: No confirmed working features due to errors in script execution.]

[Context Validation: All critical information for continuation is captured, including user requests for reviews, updates, and issue creation.]

[Recent Commands Analysis:

  • Last Agent Commands:
    1. chmod +x ./scripts/build_book.sh
    2. ./scripts/build_book.sh
  • Tool Results Summary: The script execution resulted in multiple "cannot stat" errors for various files, indicating they do not exist in the specified paths.
  • Pre-Summary State: The agent was actively trying to execute the build script and encountering errors when the token budget was exceeded.
  • Operation Context: The user is trying to execute a script to manage project files, which is critical for the project's organization and progress.]
1. Conversation Overview: - Primary Objectives: - "review the 30 day syllabus and update the bash files accordingly" - "create a detailed updated layout of the project" - "Run chmod +x ./scripts/build_book.sh" - "is the content folder used?" - "to a full review of the code base, and flag and identify files no longer needed." - "create the issues on github, providing extrema details." - "create the issues one at a time" - "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 2" - "review the content, and acting as an expert review, plan, create, refine and update acting as a subject matter expert in product analytics for week 3" - Session Context: The conversation has focused on reviewing and updating project files, executing scripts, and planning content for upcoming weeks. - User Intent Evolution: The user has shifted from executing scripts and managing files to a more strategic focus on content review and issue management.
  1. Technical Foundation:
  • Bash Scrip...

Created from VS Code via the GitHub Pull Request extension.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

@moshesham moshesham marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2025 22:29
@moshesham moshesham merged commit 75f4c7b into main Nov 13, 2025
1 check failed
Copilot AI requested a review from moshesham November 13, 2025 22:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants