Enhancement in email #1328
Open
Enhancement in email #1328
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to d469ce3 in 2 minutes and 29 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
1291lines of code in10files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. .env.template:1
- Draft comment:
Ensure sample credentials are replaced in production and sensitive data is secured. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. gpt_engineer/core/email_service.py:89
- Draft comment:
Use proper logging instead of print statements for better error tracking in production. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. gpt_engineer/core/user_service.py:155
- Draft comment:
Consider using structured logging in cleanup_expired_tokens instead of print statements for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. main/app.py:13
- Draft comment:
Database session initialization is missing. Ensure to initialize a proper DB session and pass it to your services. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is pointing to a legitimate issue - there's a TODO comment indicating database initialization is needed, and we see UserService imported but not initialized. However, this could be intentional as part of incremental development. The comment doesn't add much value beyond the existing TODO comment. The comment might be highlighting a critical infrastructure component that's missing. Without a database session, the application might not function properly. While database initialization is important, the existing TODO comment already indicates this is a known pending task. The automated comment doesn't add any new information or specific guidance. The comment should be deleted as it merely restates what's already indicated by the TODO comment and doesn't provide additional actionable guidance.
5. main/app.py:16
- Draft comment:
There's a trailing whitespace at line 16 and the file is missing a newline at the end. Please remove the extra whitespace and add a newline at the end of the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While these are real style issues, they are very minor and would likely be caught by standard linters or formatters. Most IDEs automatically handle these issues. The comment doesn't point out any logical or functional problems. The issues don't affect code behavior at all. These style issues could accumulate over time and make the codebase less consistent if not addressed. Some version control systems and tools can behave differently without end-of-file newlines. While true, these are such minor issues that they don't warrant a PR comment. They should be handled by automated tooling rather than manual review comments. Delete this comment as it points out trivial style issues that should be handled by automated tooling rather than taking up reviewer and developer attention.
Workflow ID: wflow_6ooyuHFBbNMnyfhm
You can customize 
| </button> | ||
|
|
||
| {message && ( | ||
| <div className={`alert ${message.includes('error') ? 'alert-error' : 'alert-success'}`}> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using message.includes('error') to determine alert type is brittle; consider using a dedicated error flag from the API response.
| """ | ||
|
|
||
| # Send email (implement based on your email service) | ||
| print(f"Verification email sent to {new_email}: {email_content}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace print-based email sending with integration to an asynchronous email service for production use.
| user_bp = Blueprint('user', __name__, url_prefix='/api/user') | ||
|
|
||
| # Initialize services | ||
| db_session = Session() # Create database session |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using request-scoped database sessions instead of a global session to better handle concurrency.
| # Generate verification token | ||
| self.email_verification_token = self._generate_verification_token() | ||
| self.pending_email = new_email | ||
| self.token_created_at = datetime.utcnow() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing imports for datetime and timedelta are required for token expiration logic.
| with open(config_file, "r") as f: | ||
| return tomlkit.load(f) | ||
| class ProjectConfig: | ||
| def __init__(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
SMTP configuration validation always warns since 'smtp_server' is never set in init; revise the validation logic.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What It Does
Lets users change their email address securely.
How It Works
User requests email change → Enters new email and password
System sends verification email → Link sent to new email
User clicks verification link → Confirms they own the new email
Email gets updated → Old and new emails get notified
Key Features
Secure - Requires verification before changing
User-friendly - Simple web interface
Reliable - Handles errors and duplicates
Fast - Quick verification process
Technology
Python + Flask - Web server
Token verification - Secure email confirmation
Web interface - Easy testing
Use Cases
User changes jobs and needs new work email
Old email becomes inactive
Personal preference for different email provider
Important
This PR adds a secure email change feature with verification, involving frontend, backend, and database updates.
ChangeEmailForminchangeemailform.jsx, requiring current password and new email.UserAPIclass inai.pyfor handling email change requests and verification.UserServiceinuser_service.pyfor managing email change logic and token validation.EmailServiceinemail_service.pyfor sending verification and notification emails.routers.pyfor email change, verification, and cancellation.Usermodel inmodels.pywith fields for pending email, verification token, and token creation time.EmailChangeLogmodel for logging email change requests..env.templatewith SMTP and database configurations.ProjectConfiginproject_config.pyfor email change settings.app.pyand registers user blueprint.This description was created by
for d469ce3. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.