Skip to content

chore: publish bug#74

Merged
qinluhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/publish-bug
Apr 1, 2025
Merged

chore: publish bug#74
qinluhe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/publish-bug

Conversation

@qinluhe
Copy link
Contributor

@qinluhe qinluhe commented Apr 1, 2025

Description


Checklist

General

  • I've included relevant documentation or comments for the changes introduced.
  • I've tested the changes in multiple environments (e.g., different browsers, operating systems).

Testing

  • I've added or updated tests to validate the changes introduced for AppFlowy Web.

Feature-Specific

  • For feature additions, I've added a preview (video, screenshot, or demo) in the "Feature Preview" section.
  • I've verified that this feature integrates seamlessly with existing functionality.

Summary by Sourcery

Fix minor formatting and code cleanup in publish view components

Bug Fixes:

  • Update workspaceId to 'publish' in CollabView to resolve potential rendering issue

Chores:

  • Improve code formatting with consistent spacing around operators and conditionals
  • Remove unnecessary workspace ID check in document rendering

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request includes minor code improvements focused on readability and sets a fixed workspace ID for the publish feature. Specifically, it replaces explicit equality checks with negation for boolean and null checks and sets the workspace ID to 'publish' in the CollabView component.

Updated class diagram for CollabViewProps

classDiagram
  class CollabViewProps {
    doc?: YDoc
  }
  CollabView --> YDoc : has a
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Updated conditional checks to use negation for improved readability and conciseness.
  • Replaced if(condition == false) with if(!condition).
  • Replaced if(condition == null) with if(!condition).
src/components/publish/CollabView.tsx
src/components/document/Document.tsx
Modified the CollabView component to pass a fixed workspace ID for publish.
  • Hardcoded the workspaceId prop to 'publish' when rendering the View component within CollabView.
src/components/publish/CollabView.tsx

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @qinluhe - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The changes look good, but it would be helpful to have a more descriptive commit message than 'chore: publish bug'.
  • Consider extracting the repeated switch logic into a separate helper function for better readability.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.


const handleEnter = useCallback((text: string) => {
if(!doc) return;
if (!doc) return;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)

Suggested change
if (!doc) return;
if (!doc) {


ExplanationIt is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.

Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).

const el = ref.current;

if(!el) return;
if (!el) return;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)

Suggested change
if (!el) return;
if (!el) {


ExplanationIt is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.

Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).

}, [onRendered]);

if(!document || !viewMeta.viewId || !viewMeta.workspaceId) return null;
if (!document || !viewMeta.viewId) return null;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)

Suggested change
if (!document || !viewMeta.viewId) return null;
if (!document || !viewMeta.viewId) {


ExplanationIt is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.

Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).

}, [layout]);

if(!View) return null;
if (!View) return null;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggestion (code-quality): Use block braces for ifs, whiles, etc. (use-braces)

Suggested change
if (!View) return null;
if (!View) {


ExplanationIt is recommended to always use braces and create explicit statement blocks.

Using the allowed syntax to just write a single statement can lead to very confusing
situations, especially where subsequently a developer might add another statement
while forgetting to add the braces (meaning that this wouldn't be included in the condition).

@qinluhe qinluhe merged commit b482051 into main Apr 1, 2025
3 checks passed
@qinluhe qinluhe deleted the chore/publish-bug branch April 1, 2025 02:23
appflowy added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2025
chore: Create a function to construct row key instead of writing manually
josue693 pushed a commit to josue693/AppFlowy-Web that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2025
josue693 pushed a commit to josue693/AppFlowy-Web that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2025
chore: Create a function to construct row key instead of writing manually
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments