Skip to content

PoC @alias annotation #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

PoC @alias annotation #27

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@erlend-aasland
Copy link

@erlend-aasland erlend-aasland commented Dec 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

TODO:

  • tests
  • more guards for special cases

See: python#113270

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Author

cc. @eltoder

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Author

As discussed in the upstream issue, this PR confirms that the @alias notation is straight-forward to implement. There are some corner cases to get rid of, and of course tests, before we can propose this on the CPython repo.

AlexWaygood
AlexWaygood reviewed Dec 20, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable!

Tools/clinic/clinic.py
Comment on lines +1779 to +1780
alias_def = alias_def.replace("methoddef_name",
"methoddef_alias")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels somewhat hacky, but I guess no more hacky than all the other times we're calling .replace() on templates in clinic.py :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it is a bit hacky. We could add some asserts, to make sure the code breaks sooner than later if the prototype template changes.

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Author

I'll add some guards and tests and move this upstream.

@erlend-aasland
Copy link
Author

I'll add some guards and tests and move this upstream.

As noted on the upstream issue, we need to do some more refactoring before we can finally upstream this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood AlexWaygood left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erlend-aasland @AlexWaygood