Skip to content

Conversation

@joshmossas
Copy link
Contributor

@joshmossas joshmossas commented Feb 6, 2026

This makes it to where Value implements the Default trait. Calling Value::default() creates Value::Null.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved internal implementation of the Value type by establishing a default value representation, enhancing usability for library consumers.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The Value enum in arri_repr/src/value.rs now derives the Default trait, with the Null variant designated as the default value for the type.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Default Trait Implementation
arri_repr/src/value.rs
Added Default derive to Value enum and marked Null variant with #[default] attribute.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A Null default hops into place,
No more empty trait to trace,
The Value enum stands so tall,
With Default catching all,
A simple change, but oh so right!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: implementing the Default trait for the Value type.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@282912d). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #260   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   91.83%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       30           
  Lines           ?     1642           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1508           
  Misses          ?      134           
  Partials        ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Arthurdw Arthurdw self-requested a review February 6, 2026 17:45
@Arthurdw Arthurdw merged commit 397f5f8 into Arthurdw:main Feb 6, 2026
10 checks passed
@Arthurdw
Copy link
Owner

Arthurdw commented Feb 6, 2026

Thanks for the contribution, will make a patch release in a sec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants