Skip to content

Conversation

@KATO-Hiro
Copy link
Collaborator

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro commented Nov 13, 2024

close #1474

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new contest type: "DEGwer さんの D 論応援コンテスト" with ID DEGwer2023.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed outdated test case for "CPSCO2019 Session1" and updated test case structure for improved clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new contest type by adding the contest ID DEGwer2023 and its display name to the ATCODER_OTHERS constant in the contest.ts file. Additionally, a corresponding test case for this contest is added in the contest_type.ts file, while an existing test case for a different contest is removed. The changes focus on expanding the contest classification without altering any existing functionality or logic in the related functions.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/lib/utils/contest.ts Added new contest ID DEGwer2023 with display name 'DEGwer さんの D 論応援コンテスト' to ATCODER_OTHERS constant.
src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_type.ts Added test case for contest DEGwer さんの D 論応援コンテスト with ID DEGwer2023, removed test case for CPSCO2019 Session1, and restructured remaining test cases.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Enable import of problems from contest The changes do not implement the import functionality.

Poem

In the land of contests bright,
A new name shines, a joyful sight.
DEGwer's challenge, bold and new,
With tests to match, we bid adieu.
To old foes gone, we cheer and play,
In coding fields, we hop and sway! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/utils/contest.ts (1)

159-159: Consider using kebab-case for consistency

The contest ID DEGwer2023 uses PascalCase, while the JSDoc comment above ATCODER_OTHERS specifically recommends using kebab-case for contest ID prefixes. Consider changing to degwer-2023 for consistency with the documentation and other entries.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 822f971 and f8de5da.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/lib/utils/contest.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_type.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/lib/utils/contest.ts (1)

159-159: Verify contest classification behavior

Let's verify that the new contest is correctly classified as ContestType.OTHERS.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the contest classification logic to verify this thoroughly.


Let me check one more crucial piece of information about the contest classification logic.


Contest classification for DEGwer2023 is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that DEGwer2023 is properly classified as ContestType.OTHERS:

  • It's defined in the ATCODER_OTHERS constant with the correct display name
  • The classification logic in classifyContest() will match it through atCoderOthersPrefixes
  • There's a specific test case verifying this classification in the test suite
  • No conflicts exist with other contest type patterns
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that DEGwer2023 contest is correctly classified
# Expected: The contest ID should be picked up by atCoderOthersPrefixes and classified as OTHERS

# Test 1: Check if the contest ID is included in atCoderOthersPrefixes
rg -l "const atCoderOthersPrefixes = getContestPrefixes\(ATCODER_OTHERS\)"

# Test 2: Verify the classification logic in tests
rg -l "DEGwer2023.*ContestType\.OTHERS" "src/test"

# Test 3: Check for any potential conflicts with other contest type patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($CONDITION.exec($CONTEST_ID)) { return ContestType.$TYPE; }' src/lib/utils/contest.ts

Length of output: 897


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete contest classification logic and ATCODER_OTHERS definition

# Check the ATCODER_OTHERS constant definition
rg "ATCODER_OTHERS\s*=\s*\[" -A 10 src/lib/utils/contest.ts

# Check the getContestType function implementation
rg "export function getContestType" -A 100 src/lib/utils/contest.ts

# Check if there are any test cases for contest type classification
rg "describe.*contest.*type" -A 20 "src/test"

Length of output: 4813


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how OTHERS contests are classified

# Check the complete contest.ts file content to understand the classification logic
cat src/lib/utils/contest.ts

# Also check if there are any specific test cases for OTHERS type contests
rg "ContestType\.OTHERS" -A 5 -B 5 "src/test"

Length of output: 13349

src/test/lib/utils/test_cases/contest_type.ts (2)

297-300: LGTM: New test case for DEGwer2023 contest

The test case is properly structured and consistent with other test cases in the atCoderOthers array. It correctly maps the contest ID to ContestType.OTHERS.


297-300: Verify the contest ID format

The contest ID 'DEGwer2023' uses mixed case, while most other contest IDs in the file use lowercase. Let's verify if this is intentional and matches the actual contest ID on AtCoder.

✅ Verification successful

Mixed case in contest ID appears to be correct

The contest ID 'DEGwer2023' is consistently used with mixed case in both the test file and the contest mapping in src/lib/utils/contest.ts. Looking at other contest IDs in the codebase, mixed case is used for several contest types:

  • Educational contests: APG4b, APG4bPython
  • Special contests: PCKFinal2023, PCKPrelim2023
  • Named contests: DEGwer2023
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the contest ID format on AtCoder
# Expected: Find the actual case-sensitive contest ID

# Search for any references to this contest ID in the codebase
rg -i "DEGwer2023"

# Check if there are any established patterns for contest IDs
rg "contestId: '[^']*'" | sort | uniq

Length of output: 16747

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro merged commit dfaa783 into staging Nov 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro deleted the #1474 branch November 13, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

問題をインポートできるようにしましょう

2 participants