🔧 Add Node.js v22 to CI (#1488) #1560
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in the CI workflow configuration involve expanding the Node.js versioning strategy to include both versions 20.x and 22.x. The Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3).github/workflows/ci.yml (3)Line range hint The Prisma migration steps are well-placed before deployment and correctly use separate database URLs for preview and production environments. Also applies to: 142-145 Line range hint Good choice using Node.js 20 with check-latest for deployments while testing compatibility with Node.js 22 in the build matrix. This ensures stability in production while preparing for future Node.js versions. Also applies to: 129-133
Adding Node.js 22.x to the build matrix is forward-thinking, but since it's currently in pre-release state, we should verify compatibility with key dependencies. ✅ Verification successfulNode.js 22.x compatibility looks safe to add The package.json doesn't specify any Node.js engine constraints, and reviewing the dependencies:
The absence of version constraints and the use of modern dependency versions suggests the codebase should work well with Node.js 22.x. Adding it to the CI matrix alongside 20.x is a good approach for early compatibility testing. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for potential compatibility issues with Node.js 22
rg -A 5 '"engines":|"node":' package.json
# Check for any explicit Node.js version constraints in dependencies
fd package.json -x jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | to_entries[] | select(.value | contains("node"))' {}
Length of output: 161 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if package.json exists and see its content
fd -t f "^package.json$" -x cat {}
# Also check for any package-lock.json or yarn.lock to understand dependencies
fd -t f "^package-lock.json$|^yarn.lock$" -x echo "Found: {}"
Length of output: 3067 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements