🎨 Save active contest type (#1845) #1846
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request replaces a static contest type in the TaskTable component with a reactive store-based approach. The component now imports and uses Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TT as TaskTable Component
participant ACS as activeContestTypeStore
participant U as User
%% Initialization Flow
TT->>ACS: get() for current contest type
ACS-->>TT: Return default ('abcLatest20Rounds')
%% User Interaction Flow
U->>TT: Click contest type button
TT->>ACS: set(newContestType)
ACS-->>TT: Confirm update
TT->>ACS: isSame(newContestType) for UI update
ACS-->>TT: Return comparison result
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts (1)
1-46: Well-structured store with clear documentation.The implementation of the
ActiveContestTypeStoreis clean and well-documented. The JSDoc comments provide good context about the purpose and behavior of each method.One potential enhancement to consider in the future would be making the default value configurable through a constructor parameter, which could increase flexibility if needed elsewhere in the application.
export class ActiveContestTypeStore { - value = $state<ContestTableProviders>('abcLatest20Rounds'); + value: ContestTableProviders; + + constructor(defaultValue: ContestTableProviders = 'abcLatest20Rounds') { + this.value = $state<ContestTableProviders>(defaultValue); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/lib/components/TaskTables/TaskTable.svelte(3 hunks)src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts(1 hunks)src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts (1)
src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts (1) (1)
ActiveContestTypeStore(14-43)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/lib/components/TaskTables/TaskTable.svelte (3)
19-19: Good addition of the store import.Adding the store import is a good start to implementing a more centralized state management approach.
35-35: Good refactoring to use derived store value.Replacing the static assignment with a derived value from the store is a good practice. This ensures the component stays reactive to changes in the active contest type across the application.
116-119: Well-implemented store-based state management.Using the store's methods for handling clicks and determining the active button state is a good approach. This centralizes state management and helps maintain consistency across components.
src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts (1)
1-50: Comprehensive test coverage for the store.The tests are well-structured and provide thorough coverage of the store's functionality. Good job using the
beforeEachhook to ensure each test starts with a fresh instance of the store.The tests properly verify:
- Default initialization
- Getting the current value
- Setting new values
- Comparing values with the
isSamemethodAll the test cases are meaningful and help ensure the store behaves as expected in various scenarios.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts (1)
1-55: Strong implementation of a reactive store for contest type!The implementation is clean, well-documented, and follows good practices for a Svelte state store. The class provides all necessary functionality with clear method names and proper TypeScript typing.
A few minor suggestions to consider:
The store uses Svelte's new
$statesyntax, which suggests you're working with Svelte 5 (currently in preview). Make sure your team is aware of potential API changes as Svelte 5 evolves.For more robust validation, consider adding validation in the
setmethod to ensure the provided value is a valid contest type.You might want to add a
reset()method that restores the default value, which could be useful in certain scenarios like user cancellations or application resets.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts (3)
17-23: Consider encapsulation for thevalueproperty.While the test is correct, it directly modifies the
valueproperty. Consider making this property private in the actual implementation to ensure state changes go through the setter method, which would better enforce encapsulation and potentially add validation.
21-21: Consider removing type assertion if possible.The frequent use of
as ContestTableProviderstype assertions suggests the type system could be improved. Consider using string literal types or enum values that TypeScript can automatically infer without assertions.
1-67: Consider adding tests for constructor parameter.The implementation shows that the constructor accepts a default contest type parameter, but there are no tests verifying this functionality. Consider adding a test that creates a store with a non-default initial value.
test('expects to initialize with provided value', () => { const customStore = new ActiveContestTypeStore('abc319Onwards' as ContestTableProviders); expect(customStore.get()).toBe('abc319Onwards'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts(1 hunks)src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts (1)
src/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.ts (1) (1)
ActiveContestTypeStore(14-61)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/test/lib/stores/active_contest_type.svelte.test.ts (5)
1-11: Good test setup with proper structure and initialization.The test file correctly imports necessary testing utilities and implements a clean setup pattern with
beforeEachto ensure each test runs with a fresh store instance. This is a good practice for maintaining test isolation.
13-15: Test for default initialization looks good.This test correctly verifies that the store initializes with the expected default value of 'abcLatest20Rounds'.
25-33: Good test coverage for theset()method.The test thoroughly checks that the
set()method correctly updates both the internal value and what's returned byget(). Testing with multiple values ensures consistency.
35-49: Comprehensive test for theisSame()method.This test thoroughly verifies the
isSame()method across multiple states and values, including both positive and negative cases. The structure with multiple assertion blocks is clear and effective.
51-66: Well-structured test for thereset()method.The test for the
reset()method is thorough and includes good comments explaining each step. It verifies the method works consistently from different starting values.
close #1845
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests