Skip to content

Conversation

@KATO-Hiro
Copy link
Collaborator

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro commented Mar 30, 2025

close #1631

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced grade labels now automatically adjust text size and border styling based on task grades, providing a more adaptive and visually engaging display.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined task grade handling to ensure a more consistent and simplified presentation across task lists.
  • Style

    • Updated the color scheme with refreshed hues and a distinct bronze accent, resulting in improved visual clarity.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request refactors the grade display logic across several Svelte components by updating the UI and utility functions. Components now dynamically compute text and border colors based on task grades using new utility functions. The changes include updating component properties, removing redundant utility imports, and shifting from manual styling to the dedicated GradeLabel component. Additionally, the Tailwind configuration has been updated with new color values, and new tests have been added to verify the updated grading logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/lib/components/GradeLabel.svelte Added defaultTextSize prop; updated rendering to use toChangeTextColorIfNeeds and toChangeBorderColorIfNeeds utility functions.
src/lib/components/TaskGradeList.svelte, src/lib/components/TaskList.svelte Removed unused utility function imports and the gradeColor prop; replaced manual grade rendering with the integrated GradeLabel component.
src/lib/utils/task.ts Renamed toWhiteTextIfNeeds to toChangeTextColorIfNeeds (with explicit return type) and added toChangeBorderColorIfNeeds; updated grade-based conditions.
tailwind.config.ts Updated the atcoder color palette with new hexadecimal values, including a specific value for bronze.
src/test/lib/utils/task_grade.test.ts Introduced new test cases and types to validate text and border color changes based on task grades.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as TaskList
    participant G as GradeLabel
    participant U as Utility Functions

    T->>G: Pass taskGrade, defaultTextSize, etc.
    G->>U: Call toChangeTextColorIfNeeds(taskGrade)
    U-->>G: Return computed text color class
    G->>U: Call toChangeBorderColorIfNeeds(taskGrade)
    U-->>G: Return computed border color class
    G-->>T: Render with dynamic classes
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Improve grade color visibility (#1631)

Poem

I'm a happy little rabbit with a joyful hop,
Tweaking color schemes until the code won't stop.
A dash of text and border flair,
Grades now shine with style so rare,
Hopping through changes with a beat—non-stop!
🐇🌟

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/lib/utils/task.test.ts (1)

758-769: Consider grouping test cases more granularly

The test cases for grades Q11-D5 are grouped together in a single describe block. Consider separating them into logical groups (e.g., Q grades and D grades) for better readability and maintainability, similar to how the text color tests are organized.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7a9158 and 7ac2761.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/lib/utils/task.test.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/test/lib/utils/task.test.ts (4)

23-25: Import order looks good

The imports are correctly added and follow the existing pattern in the file.

Also applies to: 30-30


71-76: Well-defined type definitions

The new type definitions TestCaseForTaskGrade and TestCasesForTaskGrade are clearly defined and follow the pattern established by other test case types in the file.


703-754: Comprehensive test coverage for text color function

The test cases for toChangeTextColorIfNeeds function cover different grade categories thoroughly:

  • Q11-Q1 grades with black text
  • D1-D5 grades with white text
  • D6 grade with a special bronze color

The structure follows the existing testing pattern in the file and properly verifies the text color logic.


756-793: Well-structured border color test cases

The test cases for toChangeBorderColorIfNeeds function appropriately test different grade categories:

  • Q11-D5 grades with white border
  • D6 grade with bronze border

The tests are organized logically and maintain consistency with the established testing pattern.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/lib/utils/task_grade.test.ts (1)

530-570: Comprehensive test cases for border color determination

The test suite properly verifies border color logic, showing that:

  • Grades Q11-Q1 and D1-D5 use white borders
  • Grade D6 uses bronze borders (AtCoder bronze color)

However, the separation of test cases into testCasesForQGrades and testCasesForDGrades on lines 532-546 seems unnecessary since they all have the same expected outcome. This doesn't affect functionality but could be simplified.

Consider simplifying by defining a single array:

-    const testCasesForQGrades = [
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q11, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q10, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q7, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q6, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q2, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q1, expected: 'border-white' },
-    ];
-    const testCasesForDGrades = [
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D1, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D2, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D4, expected: 'border-white' },
-      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D5, expected: 'border-white' },
-    ];
-    const testCases: TestCasesForTaskGrade = [...testCasesForQGrades, ...testCasesForDGrades];
+    const testCases: TestCasesForTaskGrade = [
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q11, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q10, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q7, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q6, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q2, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.Q1, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D1, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D2, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D4, expected: 'border-white' },
+      { taskGrade: TaskGrade.D5, expected: 'border-white' },
+    ];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7ac2761 and 1cc7f2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/lib/utils/task_grade.test.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/test/lib/utils/task_grade.test.ts (4)

9-10: Importing new utility functions for color handling

Good addition of imports for the new grade color utility functions. These will be tested by the new test cases added in this file.


36-41: Well-defined types for test cases

The types for test cases follow the same pattern as the existing types in the file, which is good for consistency. These types provide clear structure for the test cases that validate color changes based on task grades.


477-528: Comprehensive test cases for text color determination

The test cases are well-organized into logical groups based on grade ranges (Q11-Q1, D1-D5, D6), making it easy to understand the expected color behavior for each grade level. The tests verify that:

  • Grades Q11-Q1 use black text
  • Grades D1-D5 use white text
  • Grade D6 uses bronze text (AtCoder bronze color)

This is a good approach to ensure color accessibility and visual hierarchy in the UI.


486-495: Proper function testing methodology

Good approach using getTaskGradeLabel() before passing to the color function, which matches how these functions would be used in production code. This ensures that the tests accurately reflect real-world usage.

@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro merged commit 2b630b7 into staging Apr 2, 2025
3 checks passed
@KATO-Hiro KATO-Hiro deleted the #1631 branch April 2, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[UI] グレードの配色を識別しやすいものにしましょう

2 participants