Skip to content

Conversation

@panchalrajan
Copy link

🧩 Pull Request Summary

✨ Overview

This PR focuses on improving code efficiency, readability, and maintainability across multiple files by removing redundant logic, optimizing lookups, and simplifying structure.


🔍 Detailed Changes

🧠 RoadmapViewModel.swift

  • Removed unreachable code that previously prevented proper search behavior.

RoadmapFeature.swift

  • Replaced array-based lookup with a Set for O(1) access.
  • Removed unnecessary guard — now safely defaults to an empty array as fallback.

🗑️ ArrayExtensions.swift

  • Removed redundant file (no longer required).

🎛️ RoadmapVoteButton.swift

  • Simplified conditional logic using a ternary operator for cleaner syntax.

🎨 ColorExtensions.swift, RoadmapView.swift, RoadmapStyle.swift, RoadmapTemplates.swift

  • Removed redundant return statements for improved consistency and readability.

✅ Improvements

  • Improved performance for data lookups.
  • Cleaner and more concise codebase.
  • Reduced redundancy and improved maintainability.

Type: Refactor / Cleanup / Performance
Impact: Internal (no functional changes to user-facing behavior)

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors code to improve readability and performance by using modern Swift syntax and more efficient data structures.

  • Replaced explicit return statements with implicit returns for single-expression properties and switch cases
  • Refactored complex nested filtering logic into a cleaner, more maintainable implementation
  • Optimized vote storage to use Set-based operations instead of Array operations
  • Removed unused commented-out code file

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
Sources/Roadmap/Styling/RoadmapTemplates.swift Simplified switch cases and conditional blocks with implicit returns
Sources/Roadmap/Styling/RoadmapStyle.swift Removed explicit return statements in conditional property
Sources/Roadmap/RoadmapVoteButton.swift Consolidated accessibility value formatting logic into a single expression
Sources/Roadmap/RoadmapViewModel.swift Refactored filtering logic from nested conditionals to a unified filter expression
Sources/Roadmap/RoadmapView.swift Simplified computed properties with implicit returns
Sources/Roadmap/Models/RoadmapFeature.swift Replaced array-based vote storage with Set-based operations for better performance
Sources/Roadmap/Extensions/ColorExtensions.swift Removed explicit return statements in conditional property
Sources/Roadmap/Extensions/ArrayExtensions.swift Deleted file containing only commented-out code

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

if c == 0 { return "0 votes" }
if c == 1 { return "1 vote" }
return "\(c) votes"
"\(viewModel.voteCount) vote\(viewModel.voteCount == 1 ? "" : "s")"
Copy link

Copilot AI Oct 29, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The new implementation no longer handles the '0 votes' case specially. While '0 votes' is grammatically correct, screen readers may benefit from the explicit handling. Consider if the previous distinct handling of '0 votes' was intentional for accessibility purposes.

Suggested change
"\(viewModel.voteCount) vote\(viewModel.voteCount == 1 ? "" : "s")"
viewModel.voteCount == 0
? "No votes yet"
: "\(viewModel.voteCount) vote\(viewModel.voteCount == 1 ? "" : "s")"

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not as per the previous behavior, but since this improves clarity for accessibility, I think it’s a good change to keep.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant