Skip to content

Conversation

@v-sabiraj
Copy link
Contributor

@v-sabiraj v-sabiraj commented Sep 18, 2025

Replaced legacy field names in analytic rule queries with normalized field names (e.g., QueryType, QueryText, QueryExecutionStatus, etc.) for consistency and maintainability. Updated parser to extend and expose these normalized fields, and incremented version numbers for affected rules.

Required items, please complete

Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Reason for Change(s):

  • See guidance below

Version Updated:

  • Required only for Detections/Analytic Rule templates
  • See guidance below

Testing Completed:

image

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • See guidance below

Guidance <- remove section before submitting


Before submitting this PR please ensure that you have read the following sections and filled out the changes, reason for change and testing complete sections:

Thank you for your contribution to the Microsoft Sentinel Github repo.

Details of the code changes in your submitted PR. Providing descriptions for pull requests ensures there is context to changes being made and greatly enhances the code review process. Providing associated Issues that this resolves also easily connects the reason.

Change(s):

  • Updated syntax for XYZ.yaml

Reason for Change(s):

Version updated:

  • Yes
  • Detections/Analytic Rule templates are required to have the version updated

The code should have been tested in a Microsoft Sentinel environment that does not have any custom parsers, functions or tables, so that you validate no incorrect syntax and execution functions properly. If your submission requires a custom parser or function, it must be submitted with the PR.

Testing Completed:

  • Yes/No/Need Help

Note: If updating a detection, you must update the version field.

Before the submission has been made, please look at running the KQL and Yaml Validation Checks locally.
https://github.com/Azure/Azure-Sentinel#run-kql-validation-locally

Checked that the validations are passing and have addressed any issues that are present:

  • Yes/No/Need Help

Note: Let us know if you have tried fixing the validation error and need help.

References:


Replaced legacy field names in analytic rule queries with normalized field names (e.g., QueryType, QueryText, QueryExecutionStatus, etc.) for consistency and maintainability. Updated parser to extend and expose these normalized fields, and incremented version numbers for affected rules.
@contentautomationbot
Copy link

Hello how are you I am GitHub bot
😀😀
I see that you changed templates under the detections/analytic rules folder. Did you remember to update the version of the templates you changed?
If not, and if you want customers to be aware that a new version of this template is available, please update the version property of the template you changed.

@v-sabiraj v-sabiraj added Parser Parser specialty review needed Workbook Workbook specialty review needed Analytic Rules labels Sep 19, 2025
@v-sabiraj v-sabiraj requested a review from a team as a code owner September 23, 2025 08:32
@v-atulyadav v-atulyadav merged commit 7978f7a into master Sep 26, 2025
35 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Analytic Rules Content-Package Parser Parser specialty review needed Workbook Workbook specialty review needed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants