fix: BCPNFR1 update to include RDT and remove CARML note

[eriqua]

Overview/Summary

This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes

1. Replace me
2. Replace me
3. Replace me

Breaking Changes

1. Replace me
2. Replace me

As part of this Pull Request I have

• Read the Contribution Guide and ensured this PR is compliant with the guide
• Checked for duplicate Pull Requests
• Associated it with relevant GitHub Issues or ADO Work Items (Internal Only)
• Ensured my code/branch is up-to-date with the latest changes in the main branch
• Ensured PR tests are passing
• Updated relevant and associated documentation (e.g. Contribution Guide, Docs etc.)

[AlexanderSehr]

Is the "complex types" terminology something official? Just asking as it's the first time I hear about it 🙂

[eriqua]

Is the "complex types" terminology something official? Just asking as it's the first time I hear about it 🙂

I'd say more a general programming language term than IaC specific, as a type composed of other types. We use it in other places as well, e.g., SNFR14 and also in the existing version of this same spec.

That said, if you have a suggestion, shoot 🔫

[AlexanderSehr]

Is the "complex types" terminology something official? Just asking as it's the first time I hear about it 🙂

I'd say more a general programming language term than IaC specific, as a type composed of other types. We use it in other places as well, e.g., SNFR14 and also in the existing version of this same spec.

That said, if you have a suggestion, shoot 🔫

Nah, all good. Was just curious as we did not use it before and I thought it's something specific chosen to represent UDTs & RTS.