-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Update databox.json #16144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update databox.json #16144
Conversation
Hi, @ammaralavi Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips. Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected] |
[Call for Action] To better understand Azure service dev/test scenario, and support Azure service developer better on Swagger and REST API related tests in early phase, please help to fill in with this survey https://aka.ms/SurveyForEarlyPhase. It will take 5 to 10 minutes. If you already complete survey, please neglect this comment. Thanks. |
Swagger Validation Report
|
Rule | Message |
---|---|
1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse |
The new version has a new property 'logCollectionLevel' in response that was not found in the old version. New: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2708:7 Old: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2708:7 |
️⚠️
LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
- Linted configuring files (Based on source branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
- Linted configuring files (Based on target branch, openapi-validator v1.10.1 , classic-openapi-validator v1.1.10 )
Rule | Message |
---|---|
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The property systemData in the response of operation:'Jobs_Get' is not read only. Please add the readonly for the systemData. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L502 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The property systemData in the response of operation:'Jobs_Create' is not read only. Please add the readonly for the systemData. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L567 |
R4009 - RequiredReadOnlySystemData |
The property systemData in the response of operation:'Jobs_Update' is not read only. Please add the readonly for the systemData. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L688 |
Sku Model definition 'Sku' is not valid. A Sku model must have 'name' property. It can also have 'tier', 'size', 'family', 'capacity' as optional properties. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L4907 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isEnumerationInProgress Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L1725 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enableManifestBackup Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L1883 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isPasskeyUserDefined Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2433 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isCancellable Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L3526 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDeletable Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L3531 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isShippingAddressEditable Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L3536 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isPrepareToShipEnabled Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L3541 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isCancellableWithoutFee Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L3711 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isPerformedByCustomer Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L4152 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: sendNotification Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L4281 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: isDataAction Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L4313 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: enabled Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L5127 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: transferAllBlobs Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L5373 |
|
Booleans are not descriptive and make them hard to use. Consider using string enums with allowed set of values defined. Property: transferAllFiles Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L5377 |
|
'ApiError' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L1159 |
|
'Details' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2896 |
|
'ErrorDetail' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2978 |
|
'code' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2903 |
|
'message' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2906 |
|
'code' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2985 |
|
'message' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2988 |
|
'details' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2991 |
|
'target' model/property lacks 'description' and 'title' property. Consider adding a 'description'/'title' element. Accurate description/title is essential for maintaining reference documentation. Location: Microsoft.DataBox/preview/2021-08-01-preview/databox.json#L2997 |
️️✔️
Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️
ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️
SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️
Cross-Version Breaking Changes succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️
CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️️✔️
[Staging] SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SDKTrack2Validation
- The following tags are being changed in this PR
️️✔️
[Staging] PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️
[Staging] Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
Swagger Generation Artifacts
|
NewApiVersionRequired reason: |
@msyyc this new API version has been merged two days ago only, here is the PR to confirm we forgot to add one property in a model, the API version hasn't been checked in ARM manifest, so we aren't affecting anybody as nobody has started using this version need to get it quickly reviewed and merged so that we can continue with manifest checkin, since if we don't add this then our service will start giving many S360 KPI issues for this single property |
approve for python breaking change. |
Hi @ammaralavi, one or multiple breaking change(s) is detected in your PR. Please check out the breaking change(s), and provide business justification in the PR comment and @ PR assignee why you must have these change(s), and how external customer impact can be mitigated. Please ensure to follow breaking change policy to request breaking change review and approval before proceeding swagger PR review. |
Hi @ammaralavi I can't merge it because of the CI error: |
@msyyc Do I have to attend the office hours to get approval for breaking change or can I talk to someone quickly to get approval for this, I have created the following ADO item for this |
@ammaralavi You could try to send e-mail to @josefree ([email protected] ) for help. She is responsible for swagger breaking change |
@msyyc have got the Approved-BreakingChange tag, please go ahead and merge this PR |
MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.
Changelog
Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:
Contribution checklist:
If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.
ARM API Review Checklist
Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:
Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to begin ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays to the manifest.
-[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits.
Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.
If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.
Breaking Change Review Checklist
If any of the following scenarios apply to the PR, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.
Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Addition details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking change Wiki.
Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.