Skip to content

Conversation

msyyc
Copy link
Member

@msyyc msyyc commented Aug 20, 2024

For https://github.com/Azure/sdk-release-request/issues/5380

Context:
Revert this PR since it causes unexpected breakings for JS/Python/GO/Java SDK. And we already get approval from PR author in e-mail RE: Question about https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/29316

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

✅ All automated merging requirements have been met! To get your PR merged, see aka.ms/azsdk/specreview/merge.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 20, 2024

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Aug 20, 2024
@msyyc msyyc added the PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. label Aug 20, 2024
@mentat9 mentat9 added the ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review label Aug 20, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Aug 20, 2024
@msyyc msyyc merged commit 2bd041f into main Aug 27, 2024
27 of 30 checks passed
@msyyc msyyc deleted the revert-29316-main branch August 27, 2024 07:13
cheukchuen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMReview ARMSignedOff <valid label in PR review process>add this label when ARM approve updates after review PublishToCustomers Acknowledgement the changes will be published to Azure customers. ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager SQL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants