Skip to content

Update TypeSpec emitter version to prerelease 1.0.0-alpha.20250807.1 #51802

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

Generated by branded - http-client-csharp-mgmt build 20250807.1
Triggered from branch: main

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 7, 2025 11:54
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the TypeSpec emitter version for the Azure HTTP client C# management package from a previous alpha release to a newer prerelease version.

  • Updates the @azure-typespec/http-client-csharp-mgmt dependency version from 1.0.0-alpha.20250806.4 to 1.0.0-alpha.20250807.1
Files not reviewed (1)
  • eng/azure-typespec-http-client-csharp-mgmt-emitter-package-lock.json: Language not supported

@azure-sdk azure-sdk force-pushed the validate-typespec-20250807.1 branch from 84805ec to f31ab4d Compare August 7, 2025 21:45
Copy link
Member

@jorgerangel-msft jorgerangel-msft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, looks like there are some test failures in CI https://dev.azure.com/azure-sdk/internal/_build/results?buildId=5192178&view=results

@azure-sdk azure-sdk requested a review from avanigupta as a code owner August 7, 2025 22:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants