Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 8: Reflected server-side cross-site scripting#11
Merged
BetterMint merged 1 commit intomainfrom Dec 15, 2025
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 8: Reflected server-side cross-site scripting#11BetterMint merged 1 commit intomainfrom
BetterMint merged 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
…oss-site scripting Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/BetterMint/BetterMITM/security/code-scanning/8
General fix:
To prevent reflected XSS, any user input that is reflected in the response should be sanitized or escaped appropriately before rendering it into a page. In the context of Tornado and JSON responses, the risk is minimal, but to follow best practices, it's advisable to sanitize
flow_idbefore reflecting it in the response.Detailed best fix:
Since
flow_idcan be treated as a string (identifier), filter it for safety. You could escape it using Tornado's escaping utilities (e.g.,tornado.escape.xhtml_escapeortornado.escape.json_encode). However, since the response is JSON, a better approach is to ensure (1) it's a string, and (2) the response is always sent as JSON with the correctContent-Type. You should also defensively check or coerceflow_idto a safe representation.Changes required:
FlowStateControl.get, ensureflow_idis safely encoded/escaped before it is reflected.tornado.escape.json_encode(str(flow_id))for the value sent or, better, validate and sanitizeflow_id(e.g., allow only alphanumeric and a few safe characters).tornado.escapeis already imported.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.