Updating Packages Including The Version Of The OpenStack SDK#692
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Marked as ready to review @jkrue |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The new openstacksdk version brought a number of updates making a handful of changes necessary:
As part of this issue and evaluating changed syntax a stepping stone for #691 has been implemented, but not yet activated. The complete integration and solution of that issue will happen in its own branch.
The pyproject.toml has been simplified. In the past packages were listed that were requirements of the actual required packages. Those have been removed. A few packages had fixed versions where this is likely not necessary. Those have been eased. Now only paramiko (due to the 4.0.0 incompatability issue) and openstacksdk have fixed versions. For a perfect package version reproduction the requirements.txt or the uv.lock can be used.
Also includes a fix for #696