Skip to content

Conversation

@BrianLusina
Copy link
Owner

@BrianLusina BrianLusina commented Jan 13, 2026

Describe your change:

Count number of palindromic substrings in a string

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added comprehensive guides for palindromic substring problems, including problem definitions, solution approaches, and complexity analysis.
    • Relocated palindromic substring content within the algorithms directory structure.
  • Tests

    • Introduced test suites for palindromic substring algorithms to verify correctness across various input scenarios.
  • Style

    • Updated documentation formatting for clarity.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@BrianLusina BrianLusina self-assigned this Jan 13, 2026
@BrianLusina BrianLusina added enhancement Algorithm Algorithm Problem Datastructures Datastructures Documentation Documentation Updates Strings Dynamic Programming Dynamic Programming algorithm labels Jan 13, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change reorganizes palindromic substring problems from the two_pointers directory to the dynamic_programming directory. New implementations for counting palindromic substrings are added, along with comprehensive documentation and corresponding test modules. A minor docstring formatting update is also applied to pascals_triangle.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation and Directory Updates
DIRECTORY.md, algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md, algorithms/two_pointers/palindrome/README.md
Added new Palindromic Substring and Pascals Triangle subsections to directory index under Dynamic Programming. Added comprehensive README documenting palindromic substring problems with DP-based solution outline, complexity analysis, and problem definitions. Removed Longest Palindromic Substring documentation from two_pointers section.
Palindromic Substring Core Implementations
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/__init__.py
Implements two DP-based functions: count_palindromic_substrings and count_palindromic_substrings_2, both counting all palindromic substrings in a given string using 2D DP tables with O(n²) time and space complexity.
Longest Palindromic Substring Function
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/longest_palindromic_substring.py
Updated import path for is_palindrome dependency from relative import to algorithms.two_pointers.palindrome. Adjusted docstring formatting by relocating content to plain string literal in function body.
Test Modules
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py, algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_palindromic_substring.py
Added parameterized unit tests for longest_palindromic_substring function and for both count_palindromic_substrings variants, covering simple, edge, and extended palindromic scenarios.
Minor Documentation Update
algorithms/dynamic_programming/pascals_triangle/__init__.py
Corrected docstring formatting by changing ellipsis notation from "......," to "..," in sequence representation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Poem

🐰 Our Dynamic codes now shine,
Palindromic substrings dance in line,
From two_pointers they did move,
To DP's recursive groove,
Tests and docs complete the rhyme! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ❌ 3
❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is largely incomplete. While it marks multiple checklist items as complete, several key requirements appear unmet based on the actual changes made. Update the description to accurately reflect all changes: multiple files modified (not just one algorithm), moved content between sections, and clarify what 'Fix a bug or typo' refers to since changes appear to be mostly additive and refactoring.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 57.14% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is vague and overly generic, using broad language like 'dynamic programming problems' without specifying the main change. Revise the title to be more specific about the primary change, such as 'feat: Add palindromic substring counting algorithms' or similar.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/longest_palindromic_substring.py (1)

32-32: Critical bug: i + i should be i + 1.

When setting the result bounds for a two-character palindrome, the end index calculation is incorrect. For phrase[i] == phrase[i + 1], the palindrome spans indices [i, i + 1], not [i, i + i].

Example: For input "aa", when i=0:

  • Current: result = [0, 0] → returns "a"
  • Expected: result = [0, 1] → returns "aa"
🐛 Proposed fix
         if phrase[i] == phrase[i + 1]:
             dp[i][i + 1] = True
-            result = [i, i + i]
+            result = [i, i + 1]
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md:
- Around line 68-69: Update the sentence that currently reads "lengths greater
than three" to "lengths greater than two" in the README explanation so it
correctly matches the algorithm description (base cases for lengths 1 and 2,
loop starts at length 3); ensure the surrounding text still reads naturally
after this single-word change.

In
@algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py:
- Around line 7-15: Add missing edge-case tests to
LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES by including ("", ""), ("a", "a"), and
a length-2 palindrome case such as ("aab", "aa"); also fix the off-by-one bug in
longest_palindromic_substring.py where the center-expansion result is set with
result = [i, i + i] — change it to result = [i, i + 1] so two-character
palindromes are handled correctly (search for the variable name result and the
incorrect assignment to locate the fix).
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/__init__.py (1)

34-66: Consider documenting the difference between the two implementations.

Both functions produce identical results but use slightly different iteration patterns. The second function uses boolean arithmetic (count += dp[i][j]) which is a nice Pythonic touch.

It would be helpful to add a brief note in the docstring or a module-level comment explaining why two implementations exist (e.g., for educational purposes, different iteration order, etc.).

📝 Suggested docstring enhancement
 def count_palindromic_substrings_2(s: str) -> int:
     """
     Counts the number of palindromic substrings that can be found in the given string
+
+    This is an alternative implementation that iterates by substring length
+    rather than by difference between indices. Both approaches have the same
+    O(n²) time and space complexity.
+
     Args:
         s(str): string to check for palindromic substrings
     Returns:
         int: number of palindromic substrings
     """
📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 72a999a and 780f9dc.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (19)
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/examples/palindromic_substring_example_1.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/examples/palindromic_substring_example_2.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_1.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_10.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_11.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_12.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_13.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_14.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_15.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_16.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_17.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_2.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_3.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_4.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_5.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_6.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_7.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_8.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/images/solutions/palindromic_substring_solution_9.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • DIRECTORY.md
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/__init__.py
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/longest_palindromic_substring.py
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_palindromic_substring.py
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/pascals_triangle/README.md
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/pascals_triangle/__init__.py
  • algorithms/dynamic_programming/pascals_triangle/test_pascals_triangle.py
  • algorithms/two_pointers/palindrome/README.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • algorithms/two_pointers/palindrome/README.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py (1)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/longest_palindromic_substring.py (1)
  • longest_palindromic_substring (4-42)
🪛 LanguageTool
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md

[style] ~23-~23: Consider a more expressive alternative.
Context: ...results of the earlier computations. To do this, we can create a lookup table, dp,...

(DO_ACHIEVE)


[style] ~43-~43: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 15 exclamation marks for a text that’s 5567 characters long)
Context: ...s/palindromic_substring_solution_1.png) Solution 2 Solution 3 Solution 4 Solution 5 Solution 6 Solution 7 Solution 8 Solution 9 Solution 10 Solution 11 Solution 12 Solution 13 Solution 14 Solution 15 ![Solution 16](./images/solutions/palindr...

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md

23-23: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "j"

(MD052, reference-links-images)


24-24: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "j"

(MD052, reference-links-images)


33-33: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "i+1"

(MD052, reference-links-images)


34-34: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "i+1"

(MD052, reference-links-images)


38-38: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "1"

(MD052, reference-links-images)


40-40: Reference links and images should use a label that is defined
Missing link or image reference definition: "2"

(MD052, reference-links-images)

DIRECTORY.md

72-72: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


73-73: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6

(MD007, ul-indent)


74-74: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6

(MD007, ul-indent)


75-75: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6

(MD007, ul-indent)


76-76: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4

(MD007, ul-indent)


77-77: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 4; Actual: 6

(MD007, ul-indent)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
algorithms/dynamic_programming/pascals_triangle/__init__.py (1)

32-32: LGTM!

Minor docstring formatting improvement - using ... instead of ...... for the sequence representation is cleaner and more conventional.

algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_palindromic_substring.py (1)

1-34: LGTM!

Well-structured test module with comprehensive parameterized test cases covering:

  • Single character strings (each char is a palindrome)
  • All same characters ("aaa", "zzz", "wwwwwwwwww")
  • Mixed strings with various palindromic patterns
  • Known palindrome word ("tattarrattat")

The test values are mathematically correct (e.g., "wwwwwwwwww" with 10 chars yields 55 palindromic substrings = n*(n+1)/2).

DIRECTORY.md (1)

72-77: LGTM!

The new directory entries correctly document the added palindromic substring and Pascal's triangle files. The indentation follows the existing pattern used throughout the file.

algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/longest_palindromic_substring.py (1)

1-1: Import path is correct.

The is_palindrome function is properly exported from algorithms.two_pointers.palindrome (defined in __init__.py at line 1). The import statement is valid and will work as intended.

algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md (1)

15-16: All referenced images are present in the repository. The image files at ./images/examples/ (example_1.png, example_2.png) and ./images/solutions/ (solution_1.png through solution_17.png) have been included in the PR.

algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py (1)

18-22: LGTM!

The test class structure and parameterized test method are well-implemented. Using @parameterized.expand is the right approach for data-driven tests.

algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/__init__.py (1)

1-31: LGTM!

The DP implementation is correct. The algorithm properly:

  1. Initializes all single-character substrings as palindromes
  2. Checks adjacent pairs for length-2 palindromes
  3. Expands to longer lengths using the recurrence relation dp[i][j] = (s[i] == s[j]) and dp[i+1][j-1]

Time complexity is O(n²) and space complexity is O(n²), which is appropriate for this DP approach.

Comment on lines +68 to +69
3. After these base cases, the algorithm checks all possible substrings of lengths greater than three. However, it only
compares the first and last characters, and the rest of the substring is checked using the lookup table.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Minor text inconsistency: "three" should be "two".

The solution summary states "lengths greater than three" but should say "lengths greater than two" to be consistent with the algorithm description. Base cases handle lengths 1 and 2, so the loop checks lengths starting from 3 (i.e., greater than 2).

📝 Suggested fix
-3. After these base cases, the algorithm checks all possible substrings of lengths greater than three. However, it only
+3. After these base cases, the algorithm checks all possible substrings of lengths greater than two. However, it only
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
3. After these base cases, the algorithm checks all possible substrings of lengths greater than three. However, it only
compares the first and last characters, and the rest of the substring is checked using the lookup table.
3. After these base cases, the algorithm checks all possible substrings of lengths greater than two. However, it only
compares the first and last characters, and the rest of the substring is checked using the lookup table.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/README.md around lines
68 - 69, Update the sentence that currently reads "lengths greater than three"
to "lengths greater than two" in the README explanation so it correctly matches
the algorithm description (base cases for lengths 1 and 2, loop starts at length
3); ensure the surrounding text still reads naturally after this single-word
change.

Comment on lines +7 to +15
LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES = [
("mnm", "mnm"),
("zzz", "zzz"),
("cat", "c"),
("lever", "eve"),
("xyxxyz", "yxxy"),
("wwwwwwwwww", "wwwwwwwwww"),
("tattarrattat", "tattarrattat"),
]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add edge cases for empty string, single character, and length-2 palindromes.

The test suite is missing edge cases that could expose bugs in the implementation:

  • Empty string ""
  • Single character "a"
  • String where the longest palindrome is exactly 2 characters (e.g., "aab""aa")

The last case is particularly important because the implementation in longest_palindromic_substring.py has a bug on line 29: result = [i, i + i] should be result = [i, i + 1]. This bug would cause incorrect results when the longest palindrome is exactly 2 characters, but none of the current test cases would catch it.

🧪 Suggested additional test cases
 LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES = [
+    ("", ""),
+    ("a", "a"),
+    ("aab", "aa"),
+    ("baa", "aa"),
     ("mnm", "mnm"),
     ("zzz", "zzz"),
     ("cat", "c"),
     ("lever", "eve"),
     ("xyxxyz", "yxxy"),
     ("wwwwwwwwww", "wwwwwwwwww"),
     ("tattarrattat", "tattarrattat"),
 ]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES = [
("mnm", "mnm"),
("zzz", "zzz"),
("cat", "c"),
("lever", "eve"),
("xyxxyz", "yxxy"),
("wwwwwwwwww", "wwwwwwwwww"),
("tattarrattat", "tattarrattat"),
]
LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES = [
("", ""),
("a", "a"),
("aab", "aa"),
("baa", "aa"),
("mnm", "mnm"),
("zzz", "zzz"),
("cat", "c"),
("lever", "eve"),
("xyxxyz", "yxxy"),
("wwwwwwwwww", "wwwwwwwwww"),
("tattarrattat", "tattarrattat"),
]
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
@algorithms/dynamic_programming/palindromic_substring/test_longest_palindromic_substring.py
around lines 7 - 15, Add missing edge-case tests to
LONGEST_PALINDROMIC_SUBSTRING_TEST_CASES by including ("", ""), ("a", "a"), and
a length-2 palindrome case such as ("aab", "aa"); also fix the off-by-one bug in
longest_palindromic_substring.py where the center-expansion result is set with
result = [i, i + i] — change it to result = [i, i + 1] so two-character
palindromes are handled correctly (search for the variable name result and the
incorrect assignment to locate the fix).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Algorithm Algorithm Problem Datastructures Datastructures Documentation Documentation Updates Dynamic Programming Dynamic Programming algorithm enhancement Strings

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants