feat(bit-manipulation): sum two integers#183
Merged
BrianLusina merged 4 commits intomainfrom Mar 1, 2026
Merged
Conversation
BrianLusina
added
Algorithm
Contributor
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review infoConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new bit-manipulation solution: two functions that sum integers using bitwise operations (no +/−), a README explaining the 32-bit XOR/AND approach and two's complement handling, an entry in DIRECTORY.md, and parameterised unit tests for both implementations. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/__init__.py (1)
1-36: Reduce implementation drift between the two public functions.
integer_additionandinteger_addition_2duplicate the same algorithm, and their boundary logic has already diverged. Prefer a shared internal helper and delegate both public APIs to it.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/__init__.py` around lines 1 - 36, Both public functions integer_addition and integer_addition_2 implement the same bitwise-add algorithm but diverge in boundary logic and duplicate code; refactor by extracting a single internal helper (e.g. _integer_addition_impl(a: int, b: int) -> int) that contains the canonical loop, mask and max_int definitions, consistent carry handling ((a & b) << 1) & mask, and the same final two's-complement check (use <= max_int or < max_int consistently), then have integer_addition and integer_addition_2 simply delegate to that helper (preserve their public signatures and return types).
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/__init__.py`:
- Around line 20-25: The condition in integer_addition misclassifies the signed
max boundary (0x7FFFFFFF); change the check from "a < max_int" to "a <= max_int"
so that when a equals max_int the function returns a directly instead of
computing two's-complement; keep the existing two's-complement branch using mask
and ~(a ^ mask) for values above max_int.
In `@bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/test_sum_of_two_integers.py`:
- Around line 5-11: Update the shared test dataset
SUM_OF_TWO_INTEGERS_TEST_CASES to include signed 32-bit boundary cases: add
pairs exercising INT_MAX (2147483647) and INT_MIN (-2147483648) such as
(2147483647, 0, 2147483647), (-2147483648, 0, -2147483648), (2147483647, 1,
-2147483648) and (-2147483648, -1, 2147483647) so the suite validates
overflow/sign handling for the sum_two_integers logic; ensure these tuples
follow the existing (a, b, expected) format in SUM_OF_TWO_INTEGERS_TEST_CASES.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/__init__.py`:
- Around line 1-36: Both public functions integer_addition and
integer_addition_2 implement the same bitwise-add algorithm but diverge in
boundary logic and duplicate code; refactor by extracting a single internal
helper (e.g. _integer_addition_impl(a: int, b: int) -> int) that contains the
canonical loop, mask and max_int definitions, consistent carry handling ((a & b)
<< 1) & mask, and the same final two's-complement check (use <= max_int or <
max_int consistently), then have integer_addition and integer_addition_2 simply
delegate to that helper (preserve their public signatures and return types).
ℹ️ Review info
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (7)
bit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_1.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_2.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_3.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_4.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_5.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_6.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/images/solutions/sum_two_integers_solution_7.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
DIRECTORY.mdbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/README.mdbit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/__init__.pybit_manipulation/sum_two_integers/test_sum_of_two_integers.py
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your change:
Sum two integers without using + operator
Checklist:
Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests