Codex-generated pull request #1283
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @dittops, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the clarity and user-friendliness of the Bud AI Foundry documentation by integrating a series of Mermaid flowcharts. These visual aids are strategically placed within various project-related guides and conceptual overviews, aiming to simplify the understanding of complex workflows, system structures, and operational processes for users. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces Mermaid diagrams to several documentation files, which is a great way to visually represent workflows and concepts. My review focuses on ensuring these new diagrams are consistent and complete with respect to the existing text. I've identified a few instances where the diagrams could be improved for accuracy and clarity and have provided specific suggestions.
| ```mermaid | ||
| flowchart TD | ||
| A[Open Deployment Settings] --> B[Configure Rate Limits] | ||
| B --> C[Set Retry/Fallback] | ||
| C --> D[Enable Autoscaling] | ||
| D --> E[Monitor Scale Events] | ||
| E --> F[Iterate Using SLOs] | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The term SLOs is used in the diagram but isn't defined or explained in this document. While it's mentioned in the best practices, adding a brief explanation or linking to a definition would improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with the term.
| ```mermaid | ||
| flowchart TD | ||
| A[Open Project] --> B[Invite Member] | ||
| B --> C[Assign View/Manage] | ||
| C --> D[Review Effective Access] | ||
| D --> E[Update or Remove if Needed] | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The flowchart separates "Invite Member" and "Assign View/Manage" into two sequential steps. According to the document text, assigning a role is part of the invitation process, not a separate action. Combining these into a single step would make the diagram more accurate and less confusing.
flowchart TD
A[Open Project] --> B[Invite Member & Assign Role]
B --> C[Review Effective Access]
C --> D[Update or Remove if Needed]
2 participants
Codex generated this pull request, but encountered an unexpected error after generation. This is a placeholder PR message.
Codex Task