Skip to content

Conversation

vatsalkeshav
Copy link
Contributor

@vatsalkeshav vatsalkeshav commented Mar 26, 2025

In raising this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes):

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.
  • I have mentioned this change in the changelog.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one):

  • I have never used CCExtractor.
  • I have used CCExtractor just a couple of times.
  • I absolutely love CCExtractor, but have not contributed previously.
  • I am an active contributor to CCExtractor.

This PR migrates /src/lib_ccx/ccx_decoders_xds.c to rust.
These changes have been made-

  1. Pure rust equivalent functions in /src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/decoder_xds/functions_xds.rs
  2. Required datatypes in /src/rust/lib_ccxr/src/decoder_xds/structs_xds.rs
  3. C-compatible rust functions/exports in src/rust/src/libccxr_exports/xds_exports.rs
  4. Declaration and use of written rust functions in /src/lib_ccx/ccx_decoders_xds.c
  5. Added some #[repr(C)]s in existing structs

To-do:

  • Unit tests

@vatsalkeshav vatsalkeshav force-pushed the xds-migration branch 2 times, most recently from b5cb634 to 029d630 Compare March 29, 2025 13:44
@ccextractor-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@vatsalkeshav vatsalkeshav changed the title [FEAT] Add module decoder_xds to lib_ccxr [FEAT] WIP module decoder_xds to lib_ccxr Apr 21, 2025
@vatsalkeshav vatsalkeshav changed the title [FEAT] WIP module decoder_xds to lib_ccxr [FEAT] Add module decoder_xds to lib_ccxr Apr 21, 2025
@ccextractor-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants