-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
cpansec-minutes-2026-02-19.md #200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
robrwo
merged 4 commits into
CPAN-Security:main
from
robrwo:rrwo/meeting-minutes-2026-02-19
Mar 3, 2026
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| layout: single | ||
| toc: true | ||
| meeting_time: 2026-02-19 16:00 UTC | ||
| title: CPANSec bi-weekly minutes | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ## Agenda | ||
|
|
||
| - 2026-02-19 @ 16:00 UTC. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Attending | ||
|
|
||
| - @sjn, @stigtsp, @robrwo, @timlegge | ||
|
|
||
| - Regrets @leont | ||
|
|
||
| ## Minutes | ||
|
|
||
| - @stigtsp | ||
| - CVE workflow | ||
| - Working on alternative workflow tools for CVE based on YAML that is easier to use than Vulnogram | ||
| - Allows possible bulk updates | ||
|
|
||
| - @sjn @robrwo | ||
| - Questions about posting links to CVEs in Mastodon, BlueSky etc. | ||
| - There is no RSS available for the CVE announcement list | ||
| - @sjn suggests a custom emitter that produces content suitable for manual cut&paste (max 280 chars) for now. API auto-posting can come later | ||
|
|
||
| - @timlegge | ||
| - Suggests that a copy of published CVEs should be kept in a public git repo | ||
| - This should be a file copy, not clone of CNA repo, with sanity checks to ensure CVEs public | ||
| - @robrwo notes that we host patches from CNA repo on CPANSec website, and could host CVEs there as well | ||
| - @stigtsp MITRE has a public git repo, so this may be unnecessary | ||
|
|
||
| - @robrwo | ||
| - Working on CVE Workflow documentation | ||
| - CVE "style guide" that could be incorporated into @stigtsp's cna tool | ||
|
|
||
| - @timlegge | ||
| - OpenSSF Vulnerability Disclosure WG | ||
| - AI slop is leading to many groups getting rid of bug bounties | ||
| - WG is working on best practices to deal with slop | ||
| - WG working on a survey of maintainers | ||
| - time that users spend on open source projects? | ||
| - are they paid for working on open source? | ||
| - can they deal with AI reports? | ||
|
|
||
| - Discussions of vulnerabilties | ||
| - Details omitted from agenda. | ||
|
|
||
| - @sjn | ||
| - Suggested improving vulnerability disclosure process with time, phases and well-publiched steps. | ||
|
|
||
| - @robrwo | ||
| - Experimental triage repo unused, should be deleted @stiptsp | ||
| - Give triage list members access to the CNA repo, and use that for issue tracking | ||
| - Create a kanban | ||
|
|
||
| - @sjn | ||
| - Perl Toolchain Summit (PTS) | ||
| - Focusing on EU Cyber Resiliance Act (CRA) steward organisation | ||
| - Need to decide what the org looks like and set it up so it can be formally created | ||
| - CPANSec would be a member, but separate from the stweard org | ||
| - We have funding (via TPRF's budget) that we can choose to use to help fund a third room at PTS | ||
| - we have to get the EU CRA to work for CPAN, we *have* to update the META spec to fully update the dependency graph. | ||
| - @sjn calls for volunteers! This is critically important. | ||
|
|
||
| - @stigtsp | ||
| - CPAN pURLs | ||
| - Spec does not support selector use case we need for CVEs (author/version constraints) | ||
| - Work in process | ||
| - @sjn calls for volunteers to finish the work ASAP. | ||
|
|
||
| - @sjn | ||
| - TPRF funding | ||
| - @stiptsp | ||
| - Suggestion for sending message to the mailing list with a short budget | ||
| - Goal: put together a formal decision-making process for CPANSec | ||
|
|
||
| - @robrwo | ||
| - We need tools for accessing community documentation (license, security policy, etc) | ||
| - Meta spec/tools for downloading and showing these documents | ||
| - Possible PTS project | ||
|
|
||
| - @stigstp | ||
| - Demo of `cna` tool https://github.com/CPAN-Security/cna-tool | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.