Open
Conversation
4ever2
force-pushed
the
coq-9.1
branch
2 times, most recently
from
962ec1c to
a806cc5
Compare
Collaborator
|
Thanks a bunch @4ever2 ! |
Author
|
@mattam82 Can we get a new Docker image for CI with |
Collaborator
|
I'm on it |
Collaborator
|
@4ever2 the pipeline producing it runs here https://gitlab.inria.fr/sozeau/docker-keeper/-/pipelines/1365158 and the image should appear here https://hub.docker.com/r/mattam82/metacoq/tags |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Port CertiCoq to be compatible with Rocq 9.1, MetaRocq 1.4, and CompCert 3.17, based on @yforster's 9.1 branch.
It still depends on the Coq compatibility wrapper as I haven't ported the makefiles.
CI needs to be updated with a new Docker image with Rocq 9.1 before merging.