1 #6282
1 #6282
Conversation
|
@DevDreamerx is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe pull request integrates a new token input feature in the settings component. It adds a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant UI as Settings Component
participant PI as PasswordInput
participant AS as accessStore
U->>UI: Load settings page
UI->>UI: Check hideUserApiKey value
UI-->>U: Render token input within ListItem (if false)
U->>PI: Enter new token
PI->>AS: Call updateToken(newToken)
AS-->>PI: Return update confirmation
Poem
β¨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Nitpick comments (2)
app/components/settings.tsx (2)
1785-1797: Add token validation.While the token input implementation is clean, consider adding validation to ensure the token meets required format and security standards.
<PasswordInput value={accessStore.token} type="text" placeholder={Locale.Settings.Token.Placeholder} onChange={(e) => { + const value = e.currentTarget.value.trim(); + // Add validation here (e.g., length, format) + if (!value || value.length < 32) { + // Consider showing an error message + return; + } - accessStore.updateToken(e.currentTarget.value); + accessStore.updateToken(value); }} />
1799-1841: Refactor provider configuration components to reduce duplication.The provider-specific configuration components share similar patterns and could be refactored to reduce code duplication.
Consider creating a reusable configuration component:
interface ProviderConfig { title: string; endpoint: { value: string; placeholder: string; subtitle?: string; }; apiKey: { value: string; placeholder: string; }; // Add other common fields } function ProviderConfigComponent({ config, onUpdate }: { config: ProviderConfig; onUpdate: (field: string, value: string) => void }) { return ( <> <ListItem title={config.endpoint.title} subTitle={config.endpoint.subtitle} > <input type="text" value={config.endpoint.value} placeholder={config.endpoint.placeholder} onChange={(e) => onUpdate('endpoint', e.currentTarget.value)} /> </ListItem> <ListItem title={config.apiKey.title} subTitle={config.apiKey.subtitle} > <PasswordInput value={config.apiKey.value} placeholder={config.apiKey.placeholder} onChange={(e) => onUpdate('apiKey', e.currentTarget.value)} /> </ListItem> </> ); }
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
π Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/settings.tsx(1 hunks)
π Additional comments (1)
app/components/settings.tsx (1)
1781-1782: LGTM! Clean conditional rendering implementation.The conditional rendering based on
hideUserApiKeyis well-structured and follows React best practices.
2 participants
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit