-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Add an all job for the test matrix #11880
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9aa0220
Add an all job for the test matrix
altendky 2a784fa
Update test.yml
altendky b5ef387
Update test.yml
altendky 9a05d18
Update test.yml
altendky 4d43541
try it as a reusable workflow
altendky fe7dfb9
move the if: always() out
altendky 8dde40c
try not passing needs
altendky 0daa165
Revert "try not passing needs"
altendky File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
name: all | ||
|
||
on: | ||
workflow_call: | ||
inputs: | ||
needs: | ||
required: true | ||
type: string | ||
|
||
jobs: | ||
all: | ||
name: All | ||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
steps: | ||
- name: Require all successes | ||
shell: python | ||
env: | ||
RESULTS: ${{ toJSON(fromJSON(inputs.needs).*.result) }} | ||
run: | | ||
import json | ||
import os | ||
import sys | ||
|
||
results = json.loads(os.environ["RESULTS"]) | ||
sys.exit(0 if all(result == "success" for result in results) else 1) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey, I noticed you're reinventing the wheel here :)
I've got this https://github.com/re-actors/alls-green implemented a while back. Inspired by PyCA and some other research.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know about reinventing... pytest-dev/pytest-twisted@4c75379
:]
but yes, thanks for the heads up on your action. I noticed it over in the towncrier comments as well. I'm glad to see this practice has some traction.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we've faced this problem in aiohttp where automerge would merge broken PRs and I've accidentally seen the solution in PyCA/cryptography, then gone ahead and generalized it a bit :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As for "one check for branch protection" idea, it's ancient. Coming from CIs like Zuul and Bors.