less pre-inting for ints

[altendky]

Purpose:

i am not aware of a time where it was ever required at runtime to pre-int() the parameters to the fixed width integers. but... the hinting was wrong and that did push towards this practice. hinting was fixed (well, closer to accurate) a couple years ago perhaps. just another cleanup psas here around old practices.

Current Behavior:

New Behavior:

Testing Notes:

[github-actions]

File	Coverage	Missing Lines
chia/consensus/block_rewards.py	33.3%	lines 24, 26, 28, 30, 47, 49, 51, 53
chia/simulator/block_tools.py	0.0%	lines 1314

Total	Missing	Coverage
49 lines	9 lines	81%

[coveralls-official]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16418389109

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 40 of 49 (81.63%) changed or added relevant lines in 27 files are covered.
• 11 unchanged lines in 6 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 91.325%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
chia/simulator/block_tools.py	0	1	0.0%
chia/consensus/block_rewards.py	4	12	33.33%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
chia/full_node/full_node.py	1	88.24%
chia/full_node/pending_tx_cache.py	1	96.55%
chia/wallet/util/wallet_sync_utils.py	1	86.07%
chia/full_node/full_node_api.py	2	85.52%
chia/server/node_discovery.py	2	82.11%
chia/wallet/wallet_node.py	4	87.45%

Totals
Change from base Build 16375210539:	0.03%
Covered Lines:	101938
Relevant Lines:	111503

---

💛 - Coveralls