-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
OMIP prototype #456
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OMIP prototype #456
Conversation
…to ss/omip-prototype
…to ss/omip-prototype
|
@simone-silvestri, with the two |
|
Weird, from my calculations, it should be about 10 times faster, roughly. Maybe it did not load the correct branches? |
|
Do you think that the
|
| using Pkg | ||
| Pkg.add(PackageSpec( | ||
| name = "Oceananigans", | ||
| url = "https://github.com/CliMA/Oceananigans.jl", | ||
| rev = "ss/omip-branch-2" | ||
| )) | ||
|
|
||
| Pkg.add(PackageSpec( | ||
| name = "ClimaSeaIce", | ||
| url = "https://github.com/CliMA/ClimaSeaIce.jl", | ||
| rev = "ss/omip-branch-2" | ||
| )) | ||
| Pkg.resolve() | ||
| @show Pkg.status() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we don't need these right?
A PR that will introduce the pieces of an OMIP prototype. requires #437 and #453