-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
Fix getbc not passing extra args for discrete BC functions #4816
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bgroenks96
wants to merge
7
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
bg/fix-discrete-bc
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fcdecfb
Fix getbc not passing args for discrete BC functions
bgroenks96 9bbebb8
Improve docstring for DiscreteBoundaryFunction
bgroenks96 899aba5
Remove redundant varargs in getbc for ContinuousBoundaryFunction
bgroenks96 f100b7e
Merge branch 'bg/fix-discrete-bc' of github.com:CliMA/Oceananigans.jl…
simone-silvestri 5fc0ff0
Merge branch 'main' into bg/fix-discrete-bc
simone-silvestri 027aa8f
Revert "Merge branch 'bg/fix-discrete-bc' of github.com:CliMA/Oceanan…
bgroenks96 099c081
Merge branch 'main' into bg/fix-discrete-bc
bgroenks96 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest keeping the original behavior so that future model developers can support more arguments?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless we can articulate why removing this aspect of the code design is undesirable.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we want this, we need to pass the args... to the continuous boundary function, which is not the original behavior. If we want to support more arguments, there is some structural work to be done on the
ContinuousBoundaryFunctionsto make sure that field dependencies do not conflict with the extra arguments passed to thegetbc.It might be easier to allow this only for a
DiscreteBoundaryFunction.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here, we want to have a generic
args...so that a model implementation can pass additional arguments intofill_halo_regions!(which then are propagated intogetbc). However, havingargs...does not imply thatContinuousBoundaryFunctionhas to support interpreting it.ContinuousBoundaryFunctioncan have an interface which only utilizes the first two argumentsclock, model_fieldsand discards the rest. Then the extraargs...are only used byDiscreteBoundaryFunction.