-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
Fix type instability in AbstractOperations
#4870
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
simone-silvestri
wants to merge
14
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
ss/fix-abstract-operation-type-instability
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e459373
go for it
simone-silvestri e6d309b
Merge branch 'main' into ss/fix-abstract-operation-type-instability
simone-silvestri 07eb42f
better
simone-silvestri a1caba8
Merge branch 'ss/fix-abstract-operation-type-instability' of github.c…
simone-silvestri f9c1d2f
fix more functions
simone-silvestri c367751
also unary operations
simone-silvestri 41dff59
bugfix
simone-silvestri 2cd2b97
some more changes
simone-silvestri 851a605
revert conditional operations
simone-silvestri 07213b0
solve grid metric
simone-silvestri 0f75d65
instantiate unary operations
simone-silvestri 675d981
correct binary operations
simone-silvestri a24151b
Merge branch 'main' into ss/fix-abstract-operation-type-instability
simone-silvestri 42e8ced
another bugfix
simone-silvestri File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this has an effect (but tell me if its not true). I think this compiles identically. We use the function since its the recommendation of YASGuide (eg type parameters should be used for dispatch, not to access type info). It's not that important, but wanted to mention.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is a matter of passing arguments directly as parameteric types, which is type unstable, rather than inferring a type. The constructor cannot infer the values of an argument, but can infer the type of the arguments that are passed. Check the difference between these two constructors (which basically build the same object with just a different name)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, you are right. In the above case, there is no issue because
LX, LY, LZshould be inferred in the function call. I will revert it. The problem arises only for constructors like thisOceananigans.jl/src/AbstractOperations/binary_operations.jl
Lines 38 to 43 in f07428b
which should actually be
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
got it!