-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
Enhance simulation docstring time step argument options + add prettytime(::AbstractTime) methods
#4887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "ncc/datetime-\u0394t"
Conversation
Added support for Dates.Period in time step argument.
|
my review was requested, but so far the PR only changes the docstring. Intended? |
|
I requested it before we discussed about further changed on Simulations. |
|
I'm willing to pick this up but I can't remember where we wanted to go with it. Can you remind me @navidcy ? |
|
I actually forgot... Perhaps we close it? Or merge as is? It's an improvement. I think our original intention was to document and improve the API for datetime clock? |
|
we could merge as is, thats fine with me |
could you approve please? |
prettytime(::AbstractTime) methods
Adds support for Dates.Period in time step argument.