Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA standardized pull request template was introduced with security, performance, testing, and sign-off checklists. A GitHub Actions workflow for CodeQL-based security scanning on pull requests to the master branch was also added. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.github/workflows/security-scan.yml:
- Around line 3-5: The workflow currently triggers only on pull_request
(branches: ["master"]) which prevents CodeQL from running on pushes to the
default branch and thus stops baseline results from being populated; update the
GitHub Actions triggers in .github/workflows/security-scan.yml by adding a push
trigger for branch "master" alongside the existing pull_request trigger so
CodeQL runs on pushes to master (ensuring Security tab baseline population)
while keeping the existing pull_request configuration intact.
- Around line 20-23: Remove the misleading inline comment in the "Initialize
CodeQL" step by deleting the "Change to your language (python, go, etc.)" text
after languages: 'javascript' in the uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 block,
and remove the unnecessary autobuild step entirely (the step that invokes
github/codeql-action/autobuild) since this repo is pure JavaScript with no build
scripts.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (2)
1-27: Consider adding a PR description section at the top.The template jumps straight into checklists but lacks a section for the author to describe what the PR does and why. A brief description section (e.g., summary, linked issue/ticket, type of change) at the top helps reviewers understand context before going through the checklist.
Example addition at the top:
+## 📝 Description +<!-- Briefly describe what this PR does and why. Link any related issues. --> + +## 🔗 Related Issue +<!-- e.g., Fixes `#123` --> + ## 🛡️ Security Checklist
27-27: Minor: Missing trailing newline at end of file..github/workflows/security-scan.yml (1)
17-18: Consider pinning actions to commit SHAs for supply-chain security.Using mutable tags (
@v4,@v3) for GitHub Actions is convenient but vulnerable to tag hijacking. For a security-focused workflow, pinning to full commit SHAs is the recommended hardening practice.Also applies to: 20-21, 25-26
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [ "master" ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a push trigger on master for CodeQL baseline results.
CodeQL needs to run on pushes to the default branch to populate the Security tab and establish a baseline for PR comparisons. Without this, PR scans may produce incomplete or noisy results.
Proposed fix
on:
+ push:
+ branches: [ "master" ]
pull_request:
branches: [ "master" ]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| on: | |
| pull_request: | |
| branches: [ "master" ] | |
| on: | |
| push: | |
| branches: [ "master" ] | |
| pull_request: | |
| branches: [ "master" ] |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.github/workflows/security-scan.yml around lines 3 - 5, The workflow
currently triggers only on pull_request (branches: ["master"]) which prevents
CodeQL from running on pushes to the default branch and thus stops baseline
results from being populated; update the GitHub Actions triggers in
.github/workflows/security-scan.yml by adding a push trigger for branch "master"
alongside the existing pull_request trigger so CodeQL runs on pushes to master
(ensuring Security tab baseline population) while keeping the existing
pull_request configuration intact.
| - name: Initialize CodeQL | ||
| uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| languages: 'javascript' # Change to your language (python, go, etc.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the primary languages used in the repo
fd -e js -e ts -e py -e go -e java -e rb -e cpp -e cs | head -30
echo "---"
# Check if package.json exists to confirm JS/TS project
fd -g 'package.json' --max-depth 2Repository: CloudStuffTech/tracker-utils
Length of output: 596
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n .github/workflows/security-scan.ymlRepository: CloudStuffTech/tracker-utils
Length of output: 805
🏁 Script executed:
cat package.jsonRepository: CloudStuffTech/tracker-utils
Length of output: 987
Remove the misleading placeholder comment from the language setting.
The repository is a pure JavaScript project (package.json with only JavaScript files). The languages: 'javascript' setting is correct and not a placeholder. The comment "Change to your language (python, go, etc.)" is misleading and should be removed.
The autobuild step is optional for JavaScript-only projects without build processes. Since this repo has no build scripts, autobuild is not necessary for the CodeQL analysis to function correctly. It would only be required if compiled languages (Python, Go, C++, etc.) are added in the future.
Suggested change
- name: Initialize CodeQL
uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3
with:
- languages: 'javascript' # Change to your language (python, go, etc.)
+ languages: 'javascript'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Initialize CodeQL | |
| uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 | |
| with: | |
| languages: 'javascript' # Change to your language (python, go, etc.) | |
| - name: Initialize CodeQL | |
| uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 | |
| with: | |
| languages: 'javascript' |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In @.github/workflows/security-scan.yml around lines 20 - 23, Remove the
misleading inline comment in the "Initialize CodeQL" step by deleting the
"Change to your language (python, go, etc.)" text after languages: 'javascript'
in the uses: github/codeql-action/init@v3 block, and remove the unnecessary
autobuild step entirely (the step that invokes github/codeql-action/autobuild)
since this repo is pure JavaScript with no build scripts.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit