Add suggestion from HA Core 148989 #27
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@CoMPaTech has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis update removes the mechanism for accumulating and logging AirOS warnings only once per unique message in Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant AirOS8
participant AirOS8Data
Client->>AirOS8: status()
AirOS8->>AirOS8Data: deserialize(data)
AirOS8Data->>AirOS8Data: __pre_deserialize__(dict)
AirOS8Data-->>AirOS8: object (unknown enums removed, warnings logged)
AirOS8-->>Client: status result
Estimated code review effort3 (~40 minutes) Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
airos/airos8data.py (1)
420-421: Consider documenting the rationale for usingAnytype.The
provmodeandntpclientfields were changed from complex union types toAny, which reduces type safety. Given that theProvisioningModeandNtpClientdataclasses are defined but empty (lines 379-390), consider either:
- Properly defining these dataclasses with their expected fields, or
- Adding a comment explaining why
Anyis used hereThis would help future maintainers understand the design decision.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
airos/airos8.py(0 hunks)airos/airos8data.py(7 hunks)
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
airos/airos8data.py (1)
airos/airos8.py (1)
AirOS(24-279)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- airos/airos8.py
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
airos/airos8data.py (1)
airos/airos8.py (1)
AirOS(24-279)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Process test coverage
🔇 Additional comments (3)
airos/airos8data.py (3)
3-12: LGTM! Proper logging setup.The addition of the logging module and logger initialization is appropriate for the new pre-deserialization warning mechanism.
85-98: Good implementation of pre-deserialization validation.The change to strict enum typing for
netroleand the addition of the__pre_deserialize__hook properly handles unknown enum values before deserialization, which is a cleaner approach than post-deserialization validation.
299-344: Well-implemented enum validation for Wireless class.The changes properly enforce strict enum types for
mode,ieeemode, andsecurityfields, with comprehensive pre-deserialization validation for all three fields. This ensures unknown enum values are filtered and logged appropriately.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores