CMP-3800: Add e2e test (33431) for ComplianceCheckResult label queries by taimurhafeez · Pull Request #981 · ComplianceAsCode/compliance-operator

taimurhafeez · 2025-11-21T11:20:19Z

Verify that ComplianceCheckResult objects can be queried using labels:

compliance.openshift.io/check-severity
compliance.openshift.io/check-status
compliance.openshift.io/scan-name
compliance.openshift.io/suite

Changes

Updated TestScanProducesRemediations to TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels in tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go
Add AssertCheckResultByLabel helper in tests/e2e/framework/common.go

Run the test in make e2e-parallel E2E_GO_TEST_FLAGS="-v -run TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels"

Tested on OCP 4.21 and expected output:

=== RUN   TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== PAUSE TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== CONT  TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
2026/03/02 11:53:26 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:31 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:36 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:40 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:46 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:51 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:53:56 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:54:01 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:54:11 ComplianceScan ready (DONE)
2026/03/02 11:54:11 All scans in ComplianceSuite have finished (test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels)
osdk-e2e-9666bf4d-7b32-4cac-9127-9741af0d0080 map[compliance.openshift.io/suite:test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels]
--- PASS: TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels (52.03s)
PASS

openshift-ci · 2025-11-21T11:20:30Z

Hi @taimurhafeez. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

xiaojiey · 2025-11-26T08:06:42Z

Hi @taimurhafeez, I don't think it is meaningful to create a dedicate serial test case to check the labels for the ccr. If you really want to cover the test point, I think it is better to adding label queries to 1 existing parallel tests than creating a dedicated serial test

Anna-Koudelkova · 2025-12-01T14:33:30Z

tests/e2e/serial/main_test.go

 //							NodeSelector: workerNodesLabel,
 //							ComplianceScanSettings: compv1alpha1.ComplianceScanSettings{
 //								Debug: true,
-//							},


I would keep the curly bracket where it originally was, so that we do not merge changes that are not related to the test case

Just nitpicking with the prevous comment and here as well - the same applies to the commented lines in func createInvalidMachineConfigPool in ‎tests/e2e/framework/common.go and the comments in tests/e2e/framework/main_entry.go

I know it is early in the reviews, but I think it would be best to have it prepared exactly the way we would like to merge it :)

Anna-Koudelkova · 2025-12-01T14:39:29Z

The test case is PASSing succesfully on OCP 4.20 cluster. After running it, one of the worker nodes on my cluster has gone into degraded state though:

$ oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-2b8ffc374493b63e18f96d2aa594f092   True      False      False      3              3                   3                     0                      102m
worker   rendered-worker-033af400c2a339ce01799d80ce78313c   False     True       True       3              2                   2                     1                      102m

I am not really sure if this is just a coincidence or what is a rootcase yet, so far I just want to post it here so we have a trace that this has happened - in case it happens to someone else as well in the future

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-12-02T13:13:29Z

@taimurhafeez: This pull request references CMP-3800 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Verify that ComplianceCheckResult objects can be queried using labels:

compliance.openshift.io/check-severity

compliance.openshift.io/check-status

compliance.openshift.io/scan-name

compliance.openshift.io/suite

Changes

Updated TestScanProducesRemediations to TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels in tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

Add AssertCheckResultByLabel helper in tests/e2e/framework/common.go

-to implement this PR

The following line needs to be commented in tests/e2e/framework/main_entry.go or there will be error error creating Machine Config Pool e2e-invalid.
line to be commented --> return fmt.Errorf("failed to create Machine Config Pool %s: %w", "e2e-invalid", err)

Run the test in make e2e-serial E2E_GO_TEST_FLAGS="-v -run TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

taimurhafeez · 2025-12-02T13:25:38Z

Hi @taimurhafeez, I don't think it is meaningful to create a dedicate serial test case to check the labels for the ccr. If you really want to cover the test point, I think it is better to adding label queries to 1 existing parallel tests than creating a dedicated serial test
I added to the already TestScanProducesRemediations test but renamed it to TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels

taimurhafeez · 2025-12-02T13:30:34Z

The test case is PASSing succesfully on OCP 4.20 cluster. After running it, one of the worker nodes on my cluster has gone into degraded state though:
$ oc get mcp
NAME     CONFIG                                             UPDATED   UPDATING   DEGRADED   MACHINECOUNT   READYMACHINECOUNT   UPDATEDMACHINECOUNT   DEGRADEDMACHINECOUNT   AGE
master   rendered-master-2b8ffc374493b63e18f96d2aa594f092   True      False      False      3              3                   3                     0                      102m
worker   rendered-worker-033af400c2a339ce01799d80ce78313c   False     True       True       3              2                   2                     1                      102m
I am not really sure if this is just a coincidence or what is a rootcase yet, so far I just want to post it here so we have a trace that this has happened - in case it happens to someone else as well in the future
@Anna-Koudelkova
It is the same with me on 4.20. I dug further, and a possible reason I found is maybe it uses ocp4-moderate, which affects the cluster state, but the test itself is in parallel?

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

rhmdnd · 2025-12-02T21:37:22Z

Potential transient issue:

 === NAME  TestScanSettingBindingNoStorage
    main_test.go:4184: Expected to find PVC associated with the scan.
2025/12/02 14:16:24 waiting until suite test-custom-rule-with-multiple-inputs-ssb reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
--- FAIL: TestScanSettingBindingNoStorage (105.17s)

taimurhafeez · 2025-12-03T13:45:28Z

Potential transient issue:

 === NAME  TestScanSettingBindingNoStorage
    main_test.go:4184: Expected to find PVC associated with the scan.
2025/12/02 14:16:24 waiting until suite test-custom-rule-with-multiple-inputs-ssb reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
--- FAIL: TestScanSettingBindingNoStorage (105.17s)

possibly because I ran recently, and it went through

=== RUN   TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== PAUSE TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== CONT  TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
2025/12/03 13:33:44 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:33:49 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:33:54 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:33:59 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:34:04 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:34:09 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/03 13:34:14 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/03 13:34:19 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/03 13:34:24 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/03 13:34:29 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/03 13:34:39 ComplianceScan ready (DONE)
2025/12/03 13:34:39 All scans in ComplianceSuite have finished (test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels)
osdk-e2e-b9e29c29-69f4-4190-b7b2-b6c36fc2663e map[compliance.openshift.io/suite:test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels]
--- PASS: TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels (62.58s)
PASS

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

xiaojiey · 2025-12-05T02:00:29Z

/retest

taimurhafeez · 2025-12-08T11:11:22Z

/retest

=== RUN   TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== PAUSE TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== CONT  TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
2025/12/08 16:04:53 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:04:58 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:05:04 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:05:08 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:05:13 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:05:18 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2025/12/08 16:05:23 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/08 16:05:28 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/08 16:05:33 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/08 16:05:38 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2025/12/08 16:05:48 ComplianceScan ready (DONE)
2025/12/08 16:05:48 All scans in ComplianceSuite have finished (test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels)
osdk-e2e-053e729a-52f8-4e9c-9c97-6825dc563939 map[compliance.openshift.io/suite:test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels]
--- PASS: TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels (67.72s)
PASS
2025/12/08 16:06:00 cleaning up Profile Bundles

rhmdnd · 2025-12-08T17:38:45Z

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

 	f := framework.Global
 	bindingName := framework.GetObjNameFromTest(t)
 	tpName := framework.GetObjNameFromTest(t)
-


Unrelated whitespace change?

rhmdnd · 2025-12-08T17:38:52Z

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

 			Extends:     "ocp4-moderate",
 		},
 	}
-


Unrelated whitespace change?

rhmdnd · 2025-12-08T17:39:02Z

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

 	if err := f.WaitForSuiteScansStatus(f.OperatorNamespace, bindingName, compv1alpha1.PhaseDone, compv1alpha1.ResultNonCompliant); err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
-


Unrelated whitespace change?

rhmdnd · 2025-12-08T17:39:13Z

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

 	if err != nil {
 		t.Fatal(err)
 	}
-


Unrelated whitespace change?

tests/e2e/framework/common.go

rhmdnd

Only minor suggestions inline. Otherwise this is looking good.

taimurhafeez · 2025-12-09T09:55:11Z

Only minor suggestions inline. Otherwise this is looking good.

@rhmdnd Regarding whitespaces, I was addressing Xiaoji's comment about removing leftover lines, and then I thought it was better to keep them minimized. But now I have addressed this.

rhmdnd

/lgtm

taimurhafeez · 2026-02-25T11:48:54Z

/retest

rhmdnd

Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I have a couple recommendations on how we can make the assertions a little more robust, and a minor whitespace comment.

rhmdnd · 2026-02-27T19:10:36Z

tests/e2e/framework/common.go


 	return nil
 }
-


Unrelated whitespace change?

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-03-02T12:02:48Z

@taimurhafeez: This pull request references CMP-3800 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Verify that ComplianceCheckResult objects can be queried using labels:

compliance.openshift.io/check-severity
compliance.openshift.io/check-status
compliance.openshift.io/scan-name
compliance.openshift.io/suite

Changes

Updated TestScanProducesRemediations to TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels in tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go
Add AssertCheckResultByLabel helper in tests/e2e/framework/common.go

Run the test in make e2e-parallel E2E_GO_TEST_FLAGS="-v -run TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels"

Tested on OCP 4.21 and expected output:

=== RUN   TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== PAUSE TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
=== CONT  TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels
2026/03/02 11:53:26 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:31 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:36 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:40 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:46 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: RUNNING
2026/03/02 11:53:51 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:53:56 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:54:01 waiting until suite test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels reaches target status 'DONE'. Current status: AGGREGATING
2026/03/02 11:54:11 ComplianceScan ready (DONE)
2026/03/02 11:54:11 All scans in ComplianceSuite have finished (test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels)
osdk-e2e-9666bf4d-7b32-4cac-9127-9741af0d0080 map[compliance.openshift.io/suite:test-scan-produces-remediations-and-labels]
--- PASS: TestScanProducesRemediationsAndLabels (52.03s)
PASS

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

taimurhafeez · 2026-03-02T12:06:52Z

Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I have a couple recommendations on how we can make the assertions a little more robust, and a minor whitespace comment.

Thanks, Lance, for taking the time to review and useful comments. I have tried to address in my recent commits.

github-actions · 2026-03-02T12:08:17Z

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:981-70bd7e087b5991f634157e3e8650e491303c8bf9

rhmdnd

/lgtm
/approve

Thanks for addressing all the comments here. Looks great.

openshift-ci · 2026-03-02T16:56:10Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhmdnd, taimurhafeez

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [rhmdnd,taimurhafeez]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

rhmdnd · 2026-03-02T16:57:03Z

ROSA and serial test failures are unrelated. Attempting a fix for the serial failure (which appears to be transient) in #1100.

Verify that ComplianceCheckResult objects can be queried using labels: - compliance.openshift.io/check-severity - compliance.openshift.io/check-status - compliance.openshift.io/scan-name - compliance.openshift.io/suite Add AssertCheckResultByLabel helper to test framework

…nes 3) placed a misplaced bracket 4)Consolidated repetitive label verification code into a single loop structure

…stead of just first and used lighter profile e8

openshift-ci · 2026-03-03T13:53:04Z

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

github-actions · 2026-03-03T14:00:08Z

🤖 To deploy this PR, run the following command:

make catalog-deploy CATALOG_IMG=ghcr.io/complianceascode/compliance-operator-catalog:981-2341083e285c8e83e835ebf7d2644ee6d96288e6

openshift-ci · 2026-03-03T17:00:20Z

@taimurhafeez: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-rosa	`2341083`	link	true	`/test e2e-rosa`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial	`2341083`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial-arm	`2341083`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-serial-arm`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

rhmdnd · 2026-03-03T18:37:40Z

Serial tests are failing becuase of TestProfileBundleDefaultIsKept - which we're attempting to fix in #1100.

This PR only modified the parallel tests, which passed cleanly on both aarch64 and amd64.

openshift-ci bot requested review from Vincent056 and yuumasato November 21, 2025 11:20

openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test label Nov 21, 2025

rhmdnd added the ok-to-test label Nov 21, 2025

openshift-ci bot removed the needs-ok-to-test label Nov 26, 2025

Anna-Koudelkova reviewed Dec 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 1, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

taimurhafeez changed the title ~~Add e2e test (33431) for ComplianceCheckResult label queries~~ CMP-3800: Add e2e test (33431) for ComplianceCheckResult label queries Dec 2, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference label Dec 2, 2025

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 2, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

xiaojiey reviewed Dec 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

xiaojiey reviewed Dec 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

Extends: "ocp4-moderate",

},

}

Copy link

Collaborator

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated whitespace change?

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/parallel/main_test.go

if err != nil {

t.Fatal(err)

}

Copy link

Collaborator

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated whitespace change?

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/e2e/framework/common.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

rhmdnd reviewed Dec 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

rhmdnd approved these changes Dec 10, 2025

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned rhmdnd Dec 10, 2025

openshift-ci bot added lgtm approved labels Dec 10, 2025

rhmdnd requested changes Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Feb 27, 2026

rhmdnd approved these changes Mar 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Mar 2, 2026

taimurhafeez added 9 commits March 3, 2026 13:51

Integrate label verification test into existing parallel test

d55c38f

1) Included label in the test name 2) Removed unncessary commented li…

cd37a82

…nes 3) placed a misplaced bracket 4)Consolidated repetitive label verification code into a single loop structure

replaced a structure with key/value pairs

81ac5cb

deleted some empty lines

94f55c3

Rectified whitespace change

f59c22c

removed AssertCheckResultByLabel and its call cause of dubplication

85c81f7

Addressed Lance's comments

1d21bc0

Added logic to also check label values and checking labels on all in…

2341083

…stead of just first and used lighter profile e8

taimurhafeez force-pushed the add-test-33431 branch from 70bd7e0 to 2341083 Compare March 3, 2026 13:53

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Mar 3, 2026

rhmdnd merged commit a2a79b4 into ComplianceAsCode:master Mar 3, 2026
17 of 23 checks passed

Conversation

taimurhafeez commented Nov 21, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 21, 2025

Uh oh!

xiaojiey commented Nov 26, 2025

Uh oh!

Anna-Koudelkova Dec 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Anna-Koudelkova Dec 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Anna-Koudelkova commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 2, 2025

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Dec 2, 2025

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Dec 2, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rhmdnd commented Dec 2, 2025

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

xiaojiey commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Dec 8, 2025

Uh oh!

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rhmdnd Dec 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Dec 9, 2025

Uh oh!

rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rhmdnd Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Mar 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

rhmdnd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

rhmdnd commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

taimurhafeez commented Nov 21, 2025 •

edited

Loading

taimurhafeez commented Mar 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading