Also grant expand user access. #28
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
With out this change, if access was provisioned via a user entitlement will be moved to a group assignment, because that's how the access is actually established. So no matter how you got the access you will now both have a user and a group entitlement for that access to an app. Only the user one is requestable. I am not aware of a workaround
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With out this change, if access was provisioned via a user entitlement, that user entitlement will be moved to a group assignment, because that's how the access is actually determined at sync time. With this fix, no matter how you got the access you will now both have a user and a group entitlement for that access to an app. Only the user one is requestable. I am not aware of a workaround