Context
Nunchuk Android v2.2.8 now supports sending to Silent Payment (BIP-352) addresses.
This is relevant for am-i-exposed because Silent Payment outputs on-chain look like regular Taproot (P2TR) outputs — they are indistinguishable from standard spends. This has direct implications for privacy analysis.
Why this matters for am-i-exposed
- No address reuse by design: Each sender generates a unique on-chain address for the recipient, even when sending to the same Silent Payment address. The tool should not flag these outputs as linked.
- Output type: Silent Payment outputs are standard P2TR — the tool already handles Taproot, but should not apply heuristics that assume Taproot outputs behave like traditional reused addresses.
- Wallet fingerprinting: As more wallets add SP send support (Cake Wallet, Sparrow, Blue Wallet, and now Nunchuk), the anonymity set of Taproot-spending transactions grows, making wallet fingerprinting harder.
Tracking: wallets with Silent Payment support
| Wallet |
Send |
Receive |
Platform |
| Cake Wallet |
Yes |
Yes |
Mobile |
| Sparrow Wallet |
Yes |
Yes |
Desktop |
| Blue Wallet |
Yes |
No |
Mobile |
| Nunchuk |
Yes |
No |
Mobile/Desktop |
As SP adoption grows, the tool may eventually need to account for SP-related patterns in its analysis (e.g., single-output Taproot transactions becoming more common and less suspicious).
Context
Nunchuk Android v2.2.8 now supports sending to Silent Payment (BIP-352) addresses.
This is relevant for am-i-exposed because Silent Payment outputs on-chain look like regular Taproot (P2TR) outputs — they are indistinguishable from standard spends. This has direct implications for privacy analysis.
Why this matters for am-i-exposed
Tracking: wallets with Silent Payment support
As SP adoption grows, the tool may eventually need to account for SP-related patterns in its analysis (e.g., single-output Taproot transactions becoming more common and less suspicious).