Rebased 6.12.y-gpu branch with the upstream RPi kernel

.clippy.toml

@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
+msrv = "1.78.0"
+
 check-private-items = true
 
 disallowed-macros = [
     # The `clippy::dbg_macro` lint only works with `std::dbg!`, thus we simulate
     # it here, see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11303.
-    { path = "kernel::dbg", reason = "the `dbg!` macro is intended as a debugging tool" },
+    { path = "kernel::dbg", reason = "the `dbg!` macro is intended as a debugging tool", allow-invalid = true },
 ]

.github/workflows/ci_checkpatch.conf

@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 --ignore FILE_PATH_CHANGES
 --ignore GIT_COMMIT_ID
 --ignore SPDX_LICENSE_TAG
+--ignore UNKNOWN_COMMIT_ID

.github/workflows/dtoverlaycheck.yml

@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ jobs:
     - name: Install toolchain
       run: |
         sudo apt update
-        sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf libfdt-dev device-tree-compiler
-      timeout-minutes: 10
+        sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf libfdt-dev device-tree-compiler gnutls-dev
+      timeout-minutes: 15
 
     - uses: actions/checkout@v4
       with:
@@ -45,4 +45,4 @@ jobs:
         pwd
         make ARCH=arm KERNEL=kernel CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- bcm2711_defconfig
         make ARCH=arm KERNEL=kernel CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- dtbs
-        ${{env.UTILS_DIR}}/overlaycheck/overlaycheck
+        ${{env.UTILS_DIR}}/overlaycheck/overlaycheck -t

.github/workflows/kernel-build.yml

@@ -41,11 +41,6 @@ jobs:
             kernel: kernel7
 
           - name: bcm2711
-            arch: arm
-            defconfig: bcm2711_defconfig
-            kernel: kernel7l
-
-          - name: bcm2711_arm64
             arch: arm64
             defconfig: bcm2711_defconfig
             kernel: kernel8
@@ -72,7 +67,7 @@ jobs:
         else
           sudo apt-get install gcc-arm-linux-gnueabihf;
         fi
-      timeout-minutes: 5
+      timeout-minutes: 15
 
     - uses: actions/checkout@v4
       with:

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu

@@ -511,6 +511,7 @@ Description:	information about CPUs heterogeneity.
 
 What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/gather_data_sampling
+		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/l1tf
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mds
@@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ What:		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds
+		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsa
 		/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort
 Date:		January 2018
 Contact:	Linux kernel mailing list <[email protected]>

Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-ufs

@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ Description:	This file shows the thin provisioning type. This is one of
 
 		The file is read only.
 
-What:		/sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/unit_descriptor/physical_memory_resourse_count
+What:		/sys/class/scsi_device/*/device/unit_descriptor/physical_memory_resource_count
 Date:		February 2018
 Contact:	Stanislav Nijnikov <[email protected]>
 Description:	This file shows the total physical memory resources. This is

Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst

@@ -22,3 +22,4 @@ are configurable at compile, boot or run time.
    srso
    gather_data_sampling
    reg-file-data-sampling
+   indirect-target-selection

Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+Indirect Target Selection (ITS)
+===============================
+
+ITS is a vulnerability in some Intel CPUs that support Enhanced IBRS and were
+released before Alder Lake. ITS may allow an attacker to control the prediction
+of indirect branches and RETs located in the lower half of a cacheline.
+
+ITS is assigned CVE-2024-28956 with a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium).
+
+Scope of Impact
+---------------
+- **eIBRS Guest/Host Isolation**: Indirect branches in KVM/kernel may still be
+  predicted with unintended target corresponding to a branch in the guest.
+
+- **Intra-Mode BTI**: In-kernel training such as through cBPF or other native
+  gadgets.
+
+- **Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB)**: After an IBPB, indirect
+  branches may still be predicted with targets corresponding to direct branches
+  executed prior to the IBPB. This is fixed by the IPU 2025.1 microcode, which
+  should be available via distro updates. Alternatively microcode can be
+  obtained from Intel's github repository [#f1]_.
+
+Affected CPUs
+-------------
+Below is the list of ITS affected CPUs [#f2]_ [#f3]_:
+
+   ========================  ============  ====================  ===============
+   Common name               Family_Model  eIBRS                 Intra-mode BTI
+                                           Guest/Host Isolation
+   ========================  ============  ====================  ===============
+   SKYLAKE_X (step >= 6)     06_55H        Affected              Affected
+   ICELAKE_X                 06_6AH        Not affected          Affected
+   ICELAKE_D                 06_6CH        Not affected          Affected
+   ICELAKE_L                 06_7EH        Not affected          Affected
+   TIGERLAKE_L               06_8CH        Not affected          Affected
+   TIGERLAKE                 06_8DH        Not affected          Affected
+   KABYLAKE_L (step >= 12)   06_8EH        Affected              Affected
+   KABYLAKE (step >= 13)     06_9EH        Affected              Affected
+   COMETLAKE                 06_A5H        Affected              Affected
+   COMETLAKE_L               06_A6H        Affected              Affected
+   ROCKETLAKE                06_A7H        Not affected          Affected
+   ========================  ============  ====================  ===============
+
+- All affected CPUs enumerate Enhanced IBRS feature.
+- IBPB isolation is affected on all ITS affected CPUs, and need a microcode
+  update for mitigation.
+- None of the affected CPUs enumerate BHI_CTRL which was introduced in Golden
+  Cove (Alder Lake and Sapphire Rapids). This can help guests to determine the
+  host's affected status.
+- Intel Atom CPUs are not affected by ITS.
+
+Mitigation
+----------
+As only the indirect branches and RETs that have their last byte of instruction
+in the lower half of the cacheline are vulnerable to ITS, the basic idea behind
+the mitigation is to not allow indirect branches in the lower half.
+
+This is achieved by relying on existing retpoline support in the kernel, and in
+compilers. ITS-vulnerable retpoline sites are runtime patched to point to newly
+added ITS-safe thunks. These safe thunks consists of indirect branch in the
+second half of the cacheline. Not all retpoline sites are patched to thunks, if
+a retpoline site is evaluated to be ITS-safe, it is replaced with an inline
+indirect branch.
+
+Dynamic thunks
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+From a dynamically allocated pool of safe-thunks, each vulnerable site is
+replaced with a new thunk, such that they get a unique address. This could
+improve the branch prediction accuracy. Also, it is a defense-in-depth measure
+against aliasing.
+
+Note, for simplicity, indirect branches in eBPF programs are always replaced
+with a jump to a static thunk in __x86_indirect_its_thunk_array. If required,
+in future this can be changed to use dynamic thunks.
+
+All vulnerable RETs are replaced with a static thunk, they do not use dynamic
+thunks. This is because RETs get their prediction from RSB mostly that does not
+depend on source address. RETs that underflow RSB may benefit from dynamic
+thunks. But, RETs significantly outnumber indirect branches, and any benefit
+from a unique source address could be outweighed by the increased icache
+footprint and iTLB pressure.
+
+Retpoline
+~~~~~~~~~
+Retpoline sequence also mitigates ITS-unsafe indirect branches. For this
+reason, when retpoline is enabled, ITS mitigation only relocates the RETs to
+safe thunks. Unless user requested the RSB-stuffing mitigation.
+
+RSB Stuffing
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+RSB-stuffing via Call Depth Tracking is a mitigation for Retbleed RSB-underflow
+attacks. And it also mitigates RETs that are vulnerable to ITS.
+
+Mitigation in guests
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+All guests deploy ITS mitigation by default, irrespective of eIBRS enumeration
+and Family/Model of the guest. This is because eIBRS feature could be hidden
+from a guest. One exception to this is when a guest enumerates BHI_DIS_S, which
+indicates that the guest is running on an unaffected host.
+
+To prevent guests from unnecessarily deploying the mitigation on unaffected
+platforms, Intel has defined ITS_NO bit(62) in MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. When
+a guest sees this bit set, it should not enumerate the ITS bug. Note, this bit
+is not set by any hardware, but is **intended for VMMs to synthesize** it for
+guests as per the host's affected status.
+
+Mitigation options
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+The ITS mitigation can be controlled using the "indirect_target_selection"
+kernel parameter. The available options are:
+
+   ======== ===================================================================
+   on       (default)  Deploy the "Aligned branch/return thunks" mitigation.
+	    If spectre_v2 mitigation enables retpoline, aligned-thunks are only
+	    deployed for the affected RET instructions. Retpoline mitigates
+	    indirect branches.
+
+   off      Disable ITS mitigation.
+
+   vmexit   Equivalent to "=on" if the CPU is affected by guest/host isolation
+	    part of ITS. Otherwise, mitigation is not deployed. This option is
+	    useful when host userspace is not in the threat model, and only
+	    attacks from guest to host are considered.
+
+   stuff    Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is also deployed.
+	    Otherwise, deploy the default mitigation. When retpoline mitigation
+	    is enabled, RSB-stuffing via Call-Depth-Tracking also mitigates
+	    ITS.
+
+   force    Force the ITS bug and deploy the default mitigation.
+   ======== ===================================================================
+
+Sysfs reporting
+---------------
+
+The sysfs file showing ITS mitigation status is:
+
+  /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection
+
+Note, microcode mitigation status is not reported in this file.
+
+The possible values in this file are:
+
+.. list-table::
+
+   * - Not affected
+     - The processor is not vulnerable.
+   * - Vulnerable
+     - System is vulnerable and no mitigation has been applied.
+   * - Vulnerable, KVM: Not affected
+     - System is vulnerable to intra-mode BTI, but not affected by eIBRS
+       guest/host isolation.
+   * - Mitigation: Aligned branch/return thunks
+     - The mitigation is enabled, affected indirect branches and RETs are
+       relocated to safe thunks.
+   * - Mitigation: Retpolines, Stuffing RSB
+     - The mitigation is enabled using retpoline and RSB stuffing.
+
+References
+----------
+.. [#f1] Microcode repository - https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files
+
+.. [#f2] Affected Processors list - https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/software-security-guidance/processors-affected-consolidated-product-cpu-model.html
+
+.. [#f3] Affected Processors list (machine readable) - https://github.com/intel/Intel-affected-processor-list

Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst

@@ -157,9 +157,7 @@ This is achieved by using the otherwise unused and obsolete VERW instruction in
 combination with a microcode update. The microcode clears the affected CPU
 buffers when the VERW instruction is executed.
 
-Kernel reuses the MDS function to invoke the buffer clearing:
-
-	mds_clear_cpu_buffers()
+Kernel does the buffer clearing with x86_clear_cpu_buffers().
 
 On MDS affected CPUs, the kernel already invokes CPU buffer clear on
 kernel/userspace, hypervisor/guest and C-state (idle) transitions. No

Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt

@@ -2149,6 +2149,23 @@
 			different crypto accelerators. This option can be used
 			to achieve best performance for particular HW.
 
+	indirect_target_selection= [X86,Intel] Mitigation control for Indirect
+			Target Selection(ITS) bug in Intel CPUs. Updated
+			microcode is also required for a fix in IBPB.
+
+			on:     Enable mitigation (default).
+			off:    Disable mitigation.
+			force:	Force the ITS bug and deploy default
+				mitigation.
+			vmexit: Only deploy mitigation if CPU is affected by
+				guest/host isolation part of ITS.
+			stuff:	Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is
+				also deployed. Otherwise, deploy the default
+				mitigation.
+
+			For details see:
+			Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst
+
 	init=		[KNL]
 			Format: <full_path>
 			Run specified binary instead of /sbin/init as init
@@ -3510,6 +3527,7 @@
 				expose users to several CPU vulnerabilities.
 				Equivalent to: if nokaslr then kpti=0 [ARM64]
 					       gather_data_sampling=off [X86]
+					       indirect_target_selection=off [X86]
 					       kvm.nx_huge_pages=off [X86]
 					       l1tf=off [X86]
 					       mds=off [X86]
@@ -6243,6 +6261,8 @@
 
 			Selecting 'on' will also enable the mitigation
 			against user space to user space task attacks.
+			Selecting specific mitigation does not force enable
+			user mitigations.
 
 			Selecting 'off' will disable both the kernel and
 			the user space protections.
@@ -6973,6 +6993,19 @@
 			having this key zero'ed is acceptable. E.g. in testing
 			scenarios.
 
+	tsa=		[X86] Control mitigation for Transient Scheduler
+			Attacks on AMD CPUs. Search the following in your
+			favourite search engine for more details:
+
+			"Technical guidance for mitigating transient scheduler
+			attacks".
+
+			off		- disable the mitigation
+			on		- enable the mitigation (default)
+			user		- mitigate only user/kernel transitions
+			vm		- mitigate only guest/host transitions
+
+
 	tsc=		Disable clocksource stability checks for TSC.
 			Format: <string>
 			[x86] reliable: mark tsc clocksource as reliable, this

Documentation/arch/x86/mds.rst

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ enters a C-state.
 
 The kernel provides a function to invoke the buffer clearing:
 
-    mds_clear_cpu_buffers()
+    x86_clear_cpu_buffers()
 
 Also macro CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS can be used in ASM late in exit-to-user path.
 Other than CFLAGS.ZF, this macro doesn't clobber any registers.
@@ -185,9 +185,9 @@ Mitigation points
    idle clearing would be a window dressing exercise and is therefore not
    activated.
 
-   The invocation is controlled by the static key mds_idle_clear which is
-   switched depending on the chosen mitigation mode and the SMT state of
-   the system.
+   The invocation is controlled by the static key cpu_buf_idle_clear which is
+   switched depending on the chosen mitigation mode and the SMT state of the
+   system.
 
    The buffer clear is only invoked before entering the C-State to prevent
    that stale data from the idling CPU from spilling to the Hyper-Thread

Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst

@@ -382,6 +382,14 @@ In case of new BPF instructions, once the changes have been accepted
 into the Linux kernel, please implement support into LLVM's BPF back
 end. See LLVM_ section below for further information.
 
+Q: What "BPF_INTERNAL" symbol namespace is for?
+-----------------------------------------------
+A: Symbols exported as BPF_INTERNAL can only be used by BPF infrastructure
+like preload kernel modules with light skeleton. Most symbols outside
+of BPF_INTERNAL are not expected to be used by code outside of BPF either.
+Symbols may lack the designation because they predate the namespaces,
+or due to an oversight.
+
 Stable submission
 =================
 

Documentation/bpf/map_hash.rst

@@ -233,10 +233,16 @@ attempts in order to enforce the LRU property which have increasing impacts on
 other CPUs involved in the following operation attempts:
 
 - Attempt to use CPU-local state to batch operations
-- Attempt to fetch free nodes from global lists
+- Attempt to fetch ``target_free`` free nodes from global lists
 - Attempt to pull any node from a global list and remove it from the hashmap
 - Attempt to pull any node from any CPU's list and remove it from the hashmap
 
+The number of nodes to borrow from the global list in a batch, ``target_free``,
+depends on the size of the map. Larger batch size reduces lock contention, but
+may also exhaust the global structure. The value is computed at map init to
+avoid exhaustion, by limiting aggregate reservation by all CPUs to half the map
+size. With a minimum of a single element and maximum budget of 128 at a time.
+
 This algorithm is described visually in the following diagram. See the
 description in commit 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List") for a full explanation of
 the corresponding operations: