Skip to content

Frequentist or Bayesian estimator for Model Fitting?#20

Open
b-remy wants to merge 3 commits intoCosmoStat:developfrom
b-remy:model-fitting
Open

Frequentist or Bayesian estimator for Model Fitting?#20
b-remy wants to merge 3 commits intoCosmoStat:developfrom
b-remy:model-fitting

Conversation

@b-remy
Copy link
Member

@b-remy b-remy commented Dec 9, 2020

Hi, during Monday 7th's session, we struggled to understand the authors comparison of Frequentist versus Bayesian estimators for their model fitting algorithm (Bayesian Galaxy Shape Measurement for Weak Lensing Surveys -I., Miller et al). So I reproduced and tried to explain their experiment in a notebook, hopping to make it clearer :)

Maybe this could be a Model Fitting's subsection even though I'm not sure it fits the book format. I am ready to make any necessary changes.

@sfarrens
Copy link
Member

Thanks @b-remy, this notebook is very cool. I think with a bit of work this could easily be the start of the model fitting section of the book. We can discuss the details at the next shear book session.

@sfarrens
Copy link
Member

@b-remy Following today's discussion I recommend that you do the following:

  1. Create a new directory in shearbook called appendix.
  2. Put your notebook in that directory.
  3. Choose an appropriate name for the notebook. I don't have any good ideas yet, but I am sure we can come up with something.
  4. In _toc.yml add a new chapter (i.e. part) after Bias and Calibration called Appendix and add the name of your notebook.
- part: Appendix
  chapters:
    - file: appendix/your-notebook

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants