Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added an introductory page for PSF validation, based mainly on two papers which we had gone over in the journal club (for HSC and DES, see the bibliography file). I have not found that much to put in this section but I hope it is comprehensive ; as it is still pretty short I did not follow the organisation from issue #34
I have also found this article https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/496/4/5017/5861948 published last year which seems relevant, but I have not found this approach used in a real survey yet so I did not include it ; it may be interesting to at least mention it though, but I am not sure where.
Feel free to tell me if you think anything is missing or if something is not clear.