Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Note: This PR body was truncated due to platform limits.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
vite (source) 5.4.105.4.21 age confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2025-24010

Summary

Vite allowed any websites to send any requests to the development server and read the response due to default CORS settings and lack of validation on the Origin header for WebSocket connections.

Warning

This vulnerability even applies to users that only run the Vite dev server on the local machine and does not expose the dev server to the network.

Upgrade Path

Users that does not match either of the following conditions should be able to upgrade to a newer version of Vite that fixes the vulnerability without any additional configuration.

  • Using the backend integration feature
  • Using a reverse proxy in front of Vite
  • Accessing the development server via a domain other than localhost or *.localhost
  • Using a plugin / framework that connects to the WebSocket server on their own from the browser

Using the backend integration feature

If you are using the backend integration feature and not setting server.origin, you need to add the origin of the backend server to the server.cors.origin option. Make sure to set a specific origin rather than *, otherwise any origin can access your development server.

Using a reverse proxy in front of Vite

If you are using a reverse proxy in front of Vite and sending requests to Vite with a hostname other than localhost or *.localhost, you need to add the hostname to the new server.allowedHosts option. For example, if the reverse proxy is sending requests to http://vite:5173, you need to add vite to the server.allowedHosts option.

Accessing the development server via a domain other than localhost or *.localhost

You need to add the hostname to the new server.allowedHosts option. For example, if you are accessing the development server via http://foo.example.com:8080, you need to add foo.example.com to the server.allowedHosts option.

Using a plugin / framework that connects to the WebSocket server on their own from the browser

If you are using a plugin / framework, try upgrading to a newer version of Vite that fixes the vulnerability. If the WebSocket connection appears not to be working, the plugin / framework may have a code that connects to the WebSocket server on their own from the browser.

In that case, you can either:

  • fix the plugin / framework code to the make it compatible with the new version of Vite
  • set legacy.skipWebSocketTokenCheck: true to opt-out the fix for [2] while the plugin / framework is incompatible with the new version of Vite
    • When enabling this option, make sure that you are aware of the security implications described in the impact section of [2] above.

Mitigation without upgrading Vite

[1]: Permissive default CORS settings

Set server.cors to false or limit server.cors.origin to trusted origins.

[2]: Lack of validation on the Origin header for WebSocket connections

There aren't any mitigations for this.

[3]: Lack of validation on the Host header for HTTP requests

Use Chrome 94+ or use HTTPS for the development server.

Details

There are three causes that allowed malicious websites to send any requests to the development server:

[1]: Permissive default CORS settings

Vite sets the Access-Control-Allow-Origin header depending on server.cors option. The default value was true which sets Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *. This allows websites on any origin to fetch contents served on the development server.

Attack scenario:

  1. The attacker serves a malicious web page (http://malicious.example.com).
  2. The user accesses the malicious web page.
  3. The attacker sends a fetch('http://127.0.0.1:5173/main.js') request by JS in that malicious web page. This request is normally blocked by same-origin policy, but that's not the case for the reasons above.
  4. The attacker gets the content of http://127.0.0.1:5173/main.js.

[2]: Lack of validation on the Origin header for WebSocket connections

Vite starts a WebSocket server to handle HMR and other functionalities. This WebSocket server did not perform validation on the Origin header and was vulnerable to Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking (CSWSH) attacks. With that attack, an attacker can read and write messages on the WebSocket connection. Vite only sends some information over the WebSocket connection (list of the file paths that changed, the file content where the errored happened, etc.), but plugins can send arbitrary messages and may include more sensitive information.

Attack scenario:

  1. The attacker serves a malicious web page (http://malicious.example.com).
  2. The user accesses the malicious web page.
  3. The attacker runs new WebSocket('http://127.0.0.1:5173', 'vite-hmr') by JS in that malicious web page.
  4. The user edits some files.
  5. Vite sends some HMR messages over WebSocket.
  6. The attacker gets the content of the HMR messages.

[3]: Lack of validation on the Host header for HTTP requests

Unless server.https is set, Vite starts the development server on HTTP. Non-HTTPS servers are vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks without validation on the Host header. But Vite did not perform validation on the Host header. By exploiting this vulnerability, an attacker can send arbitrary requests to the development server bypassing the same-origin policy.

  1. The attacker serves a malicious web page that is served on HTTP (http://malicious.example.com:5173) (HTTPS won't work).
  2. The user accesses the malicious web page.
  3. The attacker changes the DNS to point to 127.0.0.1 (or other private addresses).
  4. The attacker sends a fetch('/main.js') request by JS in that malicious web page.
  5. The attacker gets the content of http://127.0.0.1:5173/main.js bypassing the same origin policy.

Impact

[1]: Permissive default CORS settings

Users with the default server.cors option may:

  • get the source code stolen by malicious websites
  • give the attacker access to functionalities that are not supposed to be exposed externally
    • Vite core does not have any functionality that causes changes somewhere else when receiving a request, but plugins may implement those functionalities and servers behind server.proxy may have those functionalities.

[2]: Lack of validation on the Origin header for WebSocket connections

All users may get the file paths of the files that changed and the file content where the error happened be stolen by malicious websites.

For users that is using a plugin that sends messages over WebSocket, that content may be stolen by malicious websites.

For users that is using a plugin that has a functionality that is triggered by messages over WebSocket, that functionality may be exploited by malicious websites.

[3]: Lack of validation on the Host header for HTTP requests

Users using HTTP for the development server and using a browser that is not Chrome 94+ may:

  • get the source code stolen by malicious websites
  • give the attacker access to functionalities that are not supposed to be exposed externally
    • Vite core does not have any functionality that causes changes somewhere else when receiving a request, but plugins may implement those functionalities and servers behind server.proxy may have those functionalities.

Chrome 94+ users are not affected for [3], because sending a request to a private network page from public non-HTTPS page is forbidden since Chrome 94.

Related Information

Safari has a bug that blocks requests to loopback addresses from HTTPS origins. This means when the user is using Safari and Vite is listening on lookback addresses, there's another condition of "the malicious web page is served on HTTP" to make [1] and [2] to work.

PoC

[2]: Lack of validation on the Origin header for WebSocket connections

  1. I used the react template which utilizes HMR functionality.
npm create vite@latest my-vue-app-react -- --template react
  1. Then on a malicious server, serve the following POC html:
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
    <head>
        <meta charset="utf-8" />
        <title>vite CSWSH</title>
    </head>
    <body>
        <div id="logs"></div>
        <script>
            const div = document.querySelectorAll('#logs')[0];
            const ws = new WebSocket('ws://localhost:5173','vite-hmr');
            ws.onmessage = event => {
                const logLine = document.createElement('p');
                logLine.innerHTML = event.data;
                div.append(logLine);
            };
        </script>
    </body>
</html>
  1. Kick off Vite
npm run dev
  1. Load the development server (open http://localhost:5173/) as well as the malicious page in the browser.
  2. Edit src/App.jsx file and intentionally place a syntax error
  3. Notice how the malicious page can view the websocket messages and a snippet of the source code is exposed

Here's a video demonstrating the POC:

vite-cswsh.mov

CVE-2025-30208

Summary

The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.

Impact

Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) are affected.

Details

@fs denies access to files outside of Vite serving allow list. Adding ?raw?? or ?import&raw?? to the URL bypasses this limitation and returns the file content if it exists. This bypass exists because trailing separators such as ? are removed in several places, but are not accounted for in query string regexes.

PoC

$ npm create vite@latest
$ cd vite-project/
$ npm install
$ npm run dev

$ echo "top secret content" > /tmp/secret.txt

# expected behaviour
$ curl "http://localhost:5173/@&#8203;fs/tmp/secret.txt"

    <body>
      <h1>403 Restricted</h1>
      <p>The request url &quot;/tmp/secret.txt&quot; is outside of Vite serving allow list.

# security bypassed
$ curl "http://localhost:5173/@&#8203;fs/tmp/secret.txt?import&raw??"
export default "top secret content\n"
//# sourceMappingURL=data:application/json;base64,eyJ2...

CVE-2025-31125

Summary

The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.

Impact

Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) are affected.

Details

  • base64 encoded content of non-allowed files is exposed using ?inline&import (originally reported as ?import&?inline=1.wasm?init)
  • content of non-allowed files is exposed using ?raw?import

/@&#8203;fs/ isn't needed to reproduce the issue for files inside the project root.

PoC

Original report (check details above for simplified cases):

The ?import&?inline=1.wasm?init ending allows attackers to read arbitrary files and returns the file content if it exists. Base64 decoding needs to be performed twice

$ npm create vite@latest
$ cd vite-project/
$ npm install
$ npm run dev

Example full URL http://localhost:5173/@&#8203;fs/C:/windows/win.ini?import&?inline=1.wasm?init

CVE-2025-31486

Summary

The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.

Impact

Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) are affected.

Details

.svg

Requests ending with .svg are loaded at this line.
https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/037f801075ec35bb6e52145d659f71a23813c48f/packages/vite/src/node/plugins/asset.ts#L285-L290
By adding ?.svg with ?.wasm?init or with sec-fetch-dest: script header, the restriction was able to bypass.

This bypass is only possible if the file is smaller than build.assetsInlineLimit (default: 4kB) and when using Vite 6.0+.

relative paths

The check was applied before the id normalization. This allowed requests to bypass with relative paths (e.g. ../../).

PoC

npm create vite@latest
cd vite-project/
npm install
npm run dev

send request to read etc/passwd

curl 'http://127.0.0.1:5173/etc/passwd?.svg?.wasm?init'
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:5173/@&#8203;fs/x/x/x/vite-project/?/../../../../../etc/passwd?import&?raw'

CVE-2025-32395

Summary

The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser if the dev server is running on Node or Bun.

Impact

Only apps with the following conditions are affected.

  • explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option)
  • running the Vite dev server on runtimes that are not Deno (e.g. Node, Bun)

Details

HTTP 1.1 spec (RFC 9112) does not allow # in request-target. Although an attacker can send such a request. For those requests with an invalid request-line (it includes request-target), the spec recommends to reject them with 400 or 301. The same can be said for HTTP 2 (ref1, ref2, ref3).

On Node and Bun, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land. For those requests, the value of http.IncomingMessage.url contains #. Vite assumed req.url won't contain # when checking server.fs.deny, allowing those kinds of requests to bypass the check.

On Deno, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land as well. But for those requests, the value of http.IncomingMessage.url did not contain #.

PoC

npm create vite@latest
cd vite-project/
npm install
npm run dev

send request to read /etc/passwd

curl --request-target /@&#8203;fs/Users/doggy/Desktop/vite-project/#/../../../../../etc/passwd http://127.0.0.1:5173

CVE-2025-58752

Summary

Any HTML files on the machine were served regardless of the server.fs settings.

Impact

Only apps that match the following conditions are affected:

  • explicitly exposes the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option)
  • appType: 'spa' (default) or appType: 'mpa' is used

This vulnerability also affects the preview server. The preview server allowed HTML files not under the output directory to be served.

Details

The serveStaticMiddleware function is in charge of serving static files from the server. It returns the viteServeStaticMiddleware function which runs the needed tests and serves the page. The viteServeStaticMiddleware function checks if the extension of the requested file is ".html". If so, it doesn't serve the page. Instead, the server will go on to the next middlewares, in this case htmlFallbackMiddleware, and then to indexHtmlMiddleware. These middlewares don't perform any test against allow or deny rules, and they don't make sure that the accessed file is in the root directory of the server. They just find the file and send back its contents to the client.

PoC

Execute the following shell commands:

npm  create  vite@latest
cd vite-project/
echo  "secret" > /tmp/secret.html
npm install
npm run dev

Then, in a different shell, run the following command:

curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/../../../../../../../../../../../tmp/secret.html'

The contents of /tmp/secret.html will be returned.

This will also work for HTML files that are in the root directory of the project, but are in the deny list (or not in the allow list). Test that by stopping the running server (CTRL+C), and running the following commands in the server's shell:

echo  'import path from "node:path"; import { defineConfig } from "vite"; export default defineConfig({server: {fs: {deny: [path.resolve(__dirname, "secret_files/*")]}}})'  >  [vite.config.js](http://vite.config.js)
mkdir secret_files
echo "secret txt" > secret_files/secret.txt
echo "secret html" > secret_files/secret.html
npm run dev

Then, in a different shell, run the following command:

curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/secret_files/secret.txt'

You will receive a 403 HTTP Response,  because everything in the secret_files directory is denied.

Now in the same shell run the following command:

curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/secret_files/secret.html'

You will receive the contents of secret_files/secret.html.

CVE-2025-58751

Summary

Files starting with the same name with the public directory were served bypassing the server.fs settings.

Impact

Only apps that match the following conditions are affected:

Details

The servePublicMiddleware function is in charge of serving public files from the server. It returns the viteServePublicMiddleware function which runs the needed tests and serves the page. The viteServePublicMiddleware function checks if the publicFiles variable is defined, and then uses it to determine if the requested page is public. In the case that the publicFiles is undefined, the code will treat the requested page as a public page, and go on with the serving function. publicFiles may be undefined if there is a symbolic link anywhere inside the public directory. In that case, every requested page will be passed to the public serving function. The serving function is based on the sirv library. Vite patches the library to add the possibility to test loading access to pages, but when the public page middleware disables this functionality since public pages are meant to be available always, regardless of whether they are in the allow or deny list.

In the case of public pages, the serving function is provided with the path to the public directory as a root directory. The code of the sirv library uses the join function to get the full path to the requested file. For example, if the public directory is "/www/public", and the requested file is "myfile", the code will join them to the string "/www/public/myfile". The code will then pass this string to the normalize function. Afterwards, the code will use the string's startsWith function to determine whether the created path is within the given directory or not. Only if it is, it will be served.

Since sirv trims the trailing slash of the public directory, the string's startsWith function may return true even if the created path is not within the public directory. For example, if the server's root is at "/www", and the public directory is at "/www/p", if the created path will be "/www/private.txt", the startsWith function will still return true, because the string "/www/private.txt" starts with  "/www/p". To achieve this, the attacker will use ".." to ask for the file "../private.txt". The code will then join it to the "/www/p" string, and will receive "/www/p/../private.txt". Then, the normalize function will return "/www/private.txt", which will then be passed to the startsWith function, which will return true, and the processing of the page will continue without checking the deny list (since this is the public directory middleware which doesn't check that).

PoC

Execute the following shell commands:

npm  create  vite@latest
cd vite-project/
mkdir p
cd p
ln -s a b
cd ..
echo  'import path from "node:path"; import { defineConfig } from "vite"; export default defineConfig({publicDir: path.resolve(__dirname, "p/"), server: {fs: {deny: [path.resolve(__dirname, "private.txt")]}}})' > vite.config.js
echo  "secret" > private.txt
npm install
npm run dev

Then, in a different shell, run the following command:

curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/private.txt'

You will receive a 403 HTTP Response,  because private.txt is denied.

Now in the same shell run the following command:

curl -v --path-as-is 'http://localhost:5173/../private.txt'

You will receive the contents of private.txt.

Related links

CVE-2025-62522

Summary

Files denied by server.fs.deny were sent if the URL ended with \ when the dev server is running on Windows.

Impact

Only apps that match the following conditions are affected:

  • explicitly exposes the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option)
  • running the dev server on Windows

Details

server.fs.deny can contain patterns matching against files (by default it includes .env, .env.*, *.{crt,pem} as such patterns). These patterns were able to bypass by using a back slash(\). The root cause is that fs.readFile('/foo.png/') loads /foo.png.

PoC

npm create vite@latest
cd vite-project/
cat "secret" > .env
npm install
npm run dev
curl --request-target /.env\ http://localhost:5173
image

Release Notes

vitejs/vite (vite)

v5.4.21

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.20

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.19

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.18

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.17

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.16

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.15

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.14

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.13

Compare Source

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.12

Compare Source

This version contains a breaking change due to security fixes. See GHSA-vg6x-rcgg-rjx6 for more details.

Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.

v5.4.11

Compare Source

Vite 6 is out!

Today, we're taking another big step in Vite's story. The Vite team, contributors, and ecosystem partners are excited to announce the release of the next Vite major:

We want to thank the more than 1K contributors to Vite Core and the maintainers and contributors of Vite plugins, integrations, tools, and translations that have helped us craft this new major. We invite you to get involved and help us improve Vite for the whole ecosystem. Learn more at our Contributing Guide.

⚠ BREAKING CHANGES
  • drop node 21 support in version ranges (#​18729)
  • deps: update dependency dotenv-expand to v12 (#​18697)
  • resolve: allow removing conditions (#​18395)
  • html: support more asset sources (#​11138)
  • remove fs.cachedChecks option (#​18493)
  • proxy bypass with WebSocket (#​18070)
  • css: remove default import in ssr dev (#​17922)
  • lib: use package name for css output file name (#​18488)
  • update to chokidar v4 (#​18453)
  • support file:// resolution (#​18422)
  • deps: update postcss-load-config to v6 (#​15235)
  • css: change default sass api to modern/modern-compiler (#​17937)
  • css: load postcss config within workspace root only (#​18440)
  • default build.cssMinify to 'esbuild' for SSR (#​15637)
  • json: add json.stringify: 'auto' and make that the default (#​18303)
  • bump minimal terser version to 5.16.0 (#​18209)
  • deps: migrate fast-glob to tinyglobby (#​18243)
Features
Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 18.35%. Comparing base (222042a) to head (da3936c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1320   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   18.35%   18.35%           
=======================================
  Files         454      454           
  Lines       74865    74865           
  Branches     1594     1594           
=======================================
  Hits        13743    13743           
  Misses      61122    61122           
Flag Coverage Δ
unitTests 18.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Playwright test results

failed  2 failed
skipped  4 skipped

Details

stats  6 tests across 3 suites
duration  18 minutes, 7 seconds
commit  da3936c

Failed tests

chromium-setup › auth.setup.ts › authenticate as user - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )
chromium-setup › auth.setup.ts › authenticate as admin - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )

Skipped tests

chromium › pages/myOrganization.test.ts › MyOrganization › Invitation Management: should display all required elements - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )
chromium › pages/myOrganization.test.ts › MyOrganization › User Management: should display all required elements - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )
chromium › pages/myOrganization.test.ts › MyOrganization › Organization Profile: should display all required elements - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )
chromium › pages/otherOrganizations.test.ts › OtherOrganizations › should have visible data-testids - ( @primary @slow @read @development @staging @production )

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 4684952 to 1f370bb Compare January 29, 2025 18:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from a0214fa to 085df7d Compare February 6, 2025 17:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from 6affc73 to b2dc043 Compare February 14, 2025 17:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 90d1fa9 to dec7d4b Compare February 21, 2025 20:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 80c83cc to 5d0a7dc Compare March 4, 2025 02:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from e17f159 to 5493d73 Compare March 17, 2025 18:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 85c1b57 to 192b68e Compare April 1, 2025 12:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 192b68e to ae2572d Compare April 8, 2025 14:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 999017d to 4e1746e Compare April 29, 2025 16:53
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.12 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.18 [security] Apr 29, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 93393a6 to cef7b54 Compare May 9, 2025 13:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from ea00aa1 to 9a323b3 Compare May 12, 2025 01:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 7 times, most recently from d8fec7c to 7215858 Compare August 22, 2025 19:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 332fcd7 to 6a3f938 Compare August 31, 2025 11:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 39d3bcd to b8294d9 Compare September 11, 2025 04:42
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.18 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.20 [security] Sep 11, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 3 times, most recently from 4d87ecc to ebc5d5b Compare September 19, 2025 17:54
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from ba3cc37 to 7ada8c5 Compare September 25, 2025 14:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 79287a7 to 766e4b0 Compare October 3, 2025 05:56
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 766e4b0 to 330b05c Compare October 7, 2025 15:34
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 330b05c to 05b2f5f Compare October 21, 2025 05:48
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.20 [security] chore(deps): update dependency vite to v5.4.21 [security] Oct 21, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 05b2f5f to 8dcbdf2 Compare November 10, 2025 20:44
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 8dcbdf2 to 8e008c9 Compare November 18, 2025 10:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 8e008c9 to 31945ac Compare December 3, 2025 19:40
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from 31945ac to a5b2d13 Compare December 31, 2025 16:03
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-vite-vulnerability branch from a5b2d13 to da3936c Compare January 8, 2026 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant