Skip to content

Conversation

meisterT
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@vmcj
Copy link
Member

vmcj commented Sep 28, 2025

I think the extra time for interactive problems should also be mentioned.
Removal of the first in contest,

@vmcj vmcj added this to the 9.0 milestone Sep 28, 2025
@meisterT
Copy link
Member Author

Do you mean a88ba4c or something else?

@meisterT
Copy link
Member Author

meisterT commented Oct 1, 2025

Do you mean a88ba4c or something else?

In case it is, it is already in 8.3.0

@meisterT meisterT force-pushed the changelog branch 2 times, most recently from f026bea to 36744c6 Compare October 1, 2025 18:29
@Kevinjil
Copy link
Contributor

Kevinjil commented Oct 1, 2025

Removal of the first in contest,

Are you referring to #3086? That should be in the changelog I think.

@meisterT
Copy link
Member Author

meisterT commented Oct 1, 2025

Removal of the first in contest,

Are you referring to #3086? That should be in the changelog I think.

I thought I added it after Michael's comment above, but apparently I didn't. It is added now.

Copy link
Contributor

@Kevinjil Kevinjil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not have a complete view of what changed since 8.3.x, but I cannot think of something missing and the contents looks good.

@vmcj
Copy link
Member

vmcj commented Oct 1, 2025

Do you mean a88ba4c or something else?

I meant the change Jaap did, but looking back that one is not relevant.

@vmcj
Copy link
Member

vmcj commented Oct 1, 2025

Other candidates which I think we need to document:
ec7ca6c
ab267ec (as people might end up with both vendor dirs)
95e6373 (it changes behaviour)

Suggestions:
Docs
7cb1de8

7cb1de8d265182cf110a7d4926e50f1771267a24
652bb06
0414353
109d20d
5f3b2bd

Copy link
Member

@vmcj vmcj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I went through the git log since 8.3 and mentioned some commits. I assume you considered those and either implemented them or had a good reason not too.. So I think this is fine.

@meisterT
Copy link
Member Author

meisterT commented Oct 3, 2025

I did include most of them, feel free to add more items where you think they are relevant.

@meisterT meisterT added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into DOMjudge:main with commit bc181f7 Oct 3, 2025
36 checks passed
@meisterT meisterT deleted the changelog branch October 3, 2025 15:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants