Mer muntlig oppo

Author: Oskar Lundström

Redovisningar/Opponering/Muntlig.md

@@ -7,30 +7,33 @@ Tips till oss: prata långsamt så att det är tydligt...
 
 ## Inledning
 
-???
+- Thank you for your presentation
+- We will now ask some questions about your project to deepen our understanding of it
 
 ## Huvuddel (fem cyklerna)
 
-- "Other modelling teqniques"
+- **Other modelling teqniques**
   - What others are there?
   - How do they work?
   - Advantages and disadvanatges compared to multi-agent?
-- "Limitations of emergence"
-  - In your report you mention...
-  - Could you elaborate on the limitations of emergence?
-- "quantity over quality"
+- **Limitations of emergence**
+  - What do you mean by saying that emergence has provisonal status?
+  - Why are study of emergent properties futile?
+  - Are there other limitations?
+- **quantity over quality**
   - Could you elaborate why you did this choice? (Vet redan svaret, men vi är listiga och låter publiken få veta)
   - When you found a very interesting model, s.a. tree growth, why not develop it further?
-- "Airplane boarding"
-  - Om de inte gjort det, så får vi presentera den
-  - Är 500 rader. Risk för fel? 
-  - Hur märker man det? 
-  - Hur kan resultaten påveras?
-  - Kan man matematiskt räkna fram den bästa strategin? För och nackdelar jämfört med som ni gjorde?
-- "Drunkards walk"
-  - Vi tyckte det var intressant att inte 0. Varför inte tror ni?
-  - Återigen, vad tycker ni om att matematiskt visa egenskapen istället?
-- "Tree growth"
+- **Airplane boarding**
+  - If they haven't presented it, we have to do it
+  - 500 lines o' code. Risk for making an error?
+    - How are they noticted?
+    - How are the results affected?
+  - Is it possible to mathematically find the best strategy? Pros and cons compared to what you did?
+  - Is any strategy used in reality? Why, why not?
+- **Drunkards walk**
+  - We found it interssting that not 0 avergae. Why do you think that's the case?
+  - Once again, what do you think about proving the property mathematically?
+- **Tree growth**
   - Introduce it
     - if not done in pres, short recap
     - Make sure it is explained thouruglhy. Let them show a picture we have prepared.
@@ -41,7 +44,7 @@ Tips till oss: prata långsamt så att det är tydligt...
   - "Best direction worth growing in".
     - What does it mean?
     - So that the model stops sometime?
-  . Would it be possible to make it look like something else, e.g. a pine-tree or an oak? What rules do you think are needed, i.e., why did it become exactly a savannah tree?
+  - Would it be possible to make it look like something else, e.g. a pine-tree or an oak? What rules do you think are needed, i.e., why did it become exactly a savannah tree?
 
 Två andra modeller: school of fish och Kolam.
 
@@ -53,8 +56,8 @@ Helst ska frågorna vi ställer visa att vi läst rapporten grundligt. Men här
 
 ## Avslutning (av skriftlig karaktär, dvs: stavfel, dålig struktur...)
 
-- Vi tycker att rapporten var välskriven även om den var för informell.
-- Vi tycker att delar av metoden kunde vara i teorin 
-- Och att det även fattades hur ni rent praktiskt genomförde skapandet av modellerna. Kunde ha kort exempel. Så att målgruppen ska kunna återskapa
-- Resultatkapitlet svårt att förstå ibland, för kortfattat
-- Intresseväckande inledning!
+- We think the report is well-written with very few grammatical and spelling mistakes. It was however too informal at times.
+- Parts of the method could have been in theory.
+- Missing how the modelling was done in practice. Not possible for us to re-do the study.
+- The results-chapter was too concise, difficult to understand parts of it.
+- The introduction was piqued our intersts! Made us look forward to read the rest of the report.