Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

  • πŸ’‘ What: This optimization adds a fast path to the collect_left_input function in the HashJoinExec operator. It avoids the expensive concat_batches operation when the build side of the join consists of a single RecordBatch.
  • 🎯 Why: The concat_batches function allocates new memory and copies data, which is unnecessary overhead when there's only one batch. This change improves performance for a common join scenario.
  • πŸ“Š Impact: Improves hash join performance by reducing memory allocation and CPU usage for single-batch build-side inputs.
  • πŸ”¬ Measurement: This can be verified by observing improved performance in benchmarks involving joins where the build side is small enough to fit into a single batch.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 4148456866613629032 started by @Dandandan

Adds a fast path to the `collect_left_input` function to avoid the expensive `concat_batches` operation when the build side consists of a single `RecordBatch`.

This optimization reduces memory allocation and CPU usage for this common scenario.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Author

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant