Robot Upgrade: submariner-operator chart upgrade from 0.19.2 to 0.22.1#3917
Robot Upgrade: submariner-operator chart upgrade from 0.19.2 to 0.22.1#3917weizhoublue wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @weizhoublue, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on upgrading the submariner-operator Helm chart to a newer version, bringing with it significant refactoring of Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and service account definitions. The changes aim to enhance the maintainability and clarity of the chart's security configurations by breaking down large, generic RBAC files into smaller, component-specific ones. This modular approach simplifies the management of permissions for different Submariner components. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request upgrades the submariner-operator chart from version 0.19.2 to 0.22.1. While the refactoring of RBAC resources into component-specific files is a positive step for maintainability, a security audit reveals critical concerns. Many defined roles and cluster roles violate the principle of least privilege, granting overly broad access to sensitive resources like secrets, configmaps, nodes, and network-related resources, which could lead to cluster-wide impact upon compromise. Furthermore, a weak default token is used in the values files. Additionally, a critical issue has been identified in the new RBAC configuration for OpenShift monitoring that will cause deployment failures if the chart is not installed in a specific namespace.
| - apiGroups: | ||
| - "" | ||
| resources: | ||
| - configmaps | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - create | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| - update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-operator ClusterRole has cluster-wide create, get, list, watch, and update permissions on ConfigMaps. The comment indicates this is for updating the CoreDNS config, but the permission is not restricted to a specific ConfigMap. A compromised operator could modify any ConfigMap in the cluster, leading to cluster-wide denial of service, configuration manipulation, or other attacks. This is a critical risk. The permission should be scoped to the specific coredns ConfigMap in the kube-system namespace by using resourceNames.
| kind: Role | ||
| metadata: | ||
| name: submariner-metrics-reader | ||
| namespace: submariner-operator |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The namespace for the submariner-metrics-reader Role is hardcoded to submariner-operator. The associated RoleBinding (read-submariner-metrics) does not specify a namespace, so it will be created in the release namespace ({{ .Release.Namespace }}). A RoleBinding can only reference a Role in the same namespace. This will cause the Helm deployment to fail if the chart is installed in any namespace other than submariner-operator.
To fix this and allow the chart to be deployed in any namespace, the Role's namespace should be dynamically set to the release namespace.
namespace: {{ .Release.Namespace }}| - apiGroups: | ||
| - "" | ||
| resources: | ||
| - secrets | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - get | ||
| - update | ||
| - create | ||
| - watch | ||
| - delete | ||
| - list |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-gateway Role has overly broad permissions on Secrets within the namespace. It is granted get, update, create, watch, delete, and list permissions on all secrets. If the gateway component were to be compromised, an attacker could potentially read, modify, or delete all secrets in the release namespace, leading to privilege escalation and compromise of other components. According to the principle of least privilege, access should be restricted to only the specific secrets (using resourceNames) that the gateway requires.
| - apiGroups: | ||
| - "" | ||
| resources: | ||
| - services | ||
| - endpoints | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - create | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| - update | ||
| - delete |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-globalnet ClusterRole is granted broad permissions to manage services and endpoints across all namespaces (create, get, list, watch, update, delete). A compromise of the submariner-globalnet component could allow an attacker to modify, intercept, or redirect network traffic for any service in the cluster. This violates the principle of least privilege. If possible, these permissions should be restricted to specific namespaces or resources.
| - apiGroups: | ||
| - "" | ||
| resources: | ||
| # For syncing Secrets from the broker | ||
| - secrets | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| - create | ||
| - update | ||
| - delete |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-operator Role is granted get, list, watch, create, update, and delete permissions on all secrets within its namespace. A compromised operator could exfiltrate or manipulate all secrets in the namespace, potentially leading to further privilege escalation. The comment states this is for syncing secrets from the broker. Access should be limited to only the specific secrets required for this function, using resourceNames or label selectors.
| - apiGroups: | ||
| - "" | ||
| resources: | ||
| - nodes | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| # route agent needs to annotate nodes to prevent OVNK SNAT | ||
| - update |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-routeagent ClusterRole has update permission on all nodes in the cluster. The comment states this is for annotating nodes, but the permission is not restricted to only annotations. A compromised route agent could modify node specs, taints, or labels, potentially causing cluster-wide scheduling disruptions or other issues. The update permission should be replaced with patch and restricted to only the necessary fields if possible, or a more sophisticated mechanism like an admission controller should be used to limit the scope of changes.
| - apiGroups: | ||
| - discovery.k8s.io | ||
| resources: | ||
| - endpointslices | ||
| - endpointslices/restricted | ||
| verbs: | ||
| - create | ||
| - get | ||
| - list | ||
| - watch | ||
| - update | ||
| - delete | ||
| - deletecollection |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The submariner-lighthouse-agent ClusterRole has full create, update, and delete permissions on EndpointSlices cluster-wide. A compromise of this agent could allow an attacker to manipulate EndpointSlices for any service in the cluster, leading to traffic interception, redirection, or denial of service. While this may be required for multi-cluster service discovery, it represents a significant concentration of privilege.
| tag: "0.19.2" | ||
| tag: "0.22.1" | ||
| registry: quay.m.daocloud.io | ||
| broker: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The default value for broker.token is a weak, hardcoded placeholder ('test'). If an administrator deploys the chart without overriding this value, the broker connection will be authenticated with a well-known, insecure token. The default value should be changed to an empty string ("") to force the user to provide a strong, unique token.
token: ""c9eb66c to
ae2e013
Compare
Signed-off-by: robot <robot@example.com>
ae2e013 to
4cb0c43
Compare
I am robot, upgrade: project submariner-operator chart upgrade from 0.19.2 to 0.22.1