Skip to content

Drop redundant rootPath from fleet installer config#46719

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
regis.desgroppes/fleet-installer-drop-rootpath-from-apply
Feb 23, 2026
Merged

Drop redundant rootPath from fleet installer config#46719
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
regis.desgroppes/fleet-installer-drop-rootpath-from-apply

Conversation

@rdesgroppes
Copy link
Contributor

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes commented Feb 20, 2026

What does this PR do?

  1. remove the rootPath parameter from FileOperation.apply(), replacing filepath.Join(rootPath, ...) calls with filepath.Join(root.Name(), ...).
  2. pass *os.Root into setFileOwnershipAndPermissions and use root.Chmod() in place of os.Chmod(), but:
    • root.Chown() is not used as it requires numeric uid/gid,
    • file.Chown() still handles the name lookup internally and requires a full path.

Motivation

  1. address a trivial TODO, follow-up of Use Go 1.25 os.Root API in fleet installer config #46592: once root.RemoveAll() replaced the last os-level filepath.Join(rootPath, ...) call, rootPath's sole remaining purpose was feeding setFileOwnershipAndPermissions: root.Name() returns the equivalent value,
  2. address review comment: use os.Root APIs where possible instead of reconstructing full paths at call sites.

Describe how you validated your changes

Existing unit tests pass unchanged.

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Feb 20, 2026
@dd-octo-sts dd-octo-sts bot added internal Identify a non-fork PR team/windows-products labels Feb 20, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Feb 20, 2026
@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2026 10:19
@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes requested review from a team as code owners February 20, 2026 10:19
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Static quality checks

✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor cded3a1
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_heroku_amd64 +3.97 KiB (0.00% increase) 323.754 → 323.758 → 329.530
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +4.31 KiB (0.00% increase) 696.201 → 696.205 → 703.390
agent_suse_arm64_fips +4.31 KiB (0.00% increase) 696.201 → 696.205 → 703.390
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +24.0 KiB (0.01% increase) 192.318 → 192.342 → 193.610
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 +63.99 KiB (0.03% increase) 207.582 → 207.644 → 208.190
26 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
agent_deb_amd64 755.988 MiB
agent_deb_amd64_fips 715.077 MiB
agent_msi 622.073 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64 755.972 MiB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips 715.061 MiB
agent_rpm_arm64 734.126 MiB
agent_suse_amd64 755.972 MiB
agent_suse_amd64_fips 715.061 MiB
agent_suse_arm64 734.126 MiB
docker_agent_amd64 817.022 MiB
docker_agent_arm64 819.911 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 1007.933 MiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 999.605 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.135 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 38.500 MiB
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 36.812 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 29.720 MiB
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 27.881 MiB
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 29.720 MiB
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 29.720 MiB
iot_agent_deb_amd64 42.617 MiB
iot_agent_deb_arm64 39.723 MiB
iot_agent_deb_armhf 40.447 MiB
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 42.618 MiB
iot_agent_suse_amd64 42.618 MiB
On-wire sizes (compressed)
Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +19.91 KiB (0.01% increase) 185.426 → 185.446 → 186.090
agent_deb_amd64_fips -39.45 KiB (0.02% reduction) 176.326 → 176.288 → 180.330
agent_heroku_amd64 +2.89 KiB (0.00% increase) 87.103 → 87.106 → 88.440
agent_msi +4.0 KiB (0.00% increase) 149.215 → 149.219 → 154.470
agent_rpm_amd64 -16.7 KiB (0.01% reduction) 187.310 → 187.294 → 189.170
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +27.43 KiB (0.02% increase) 178.398 → 178.424 → 181.060
agent_rpm_arm64 +11.34 KiB (0.01% increase) 169.718 → 169.729 → 170.020
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +45.52 KiB (0.03% increase) 162.456 → 162.500 → 164.130
agent_suse_amd64 -16.7 KiB (0.01% reduction) 187.310 → 187.294 → 189.170
agent_suse_amd64_fips +27.43 KiB (0.02% increase) 178.398 → 178.424 → 181.060
agent_suse_arm64 +11.34 KiB (0.01% increase) 169.718 → 169.729 → 170.020
agent_suse_arm64_fips +45.52 KiB (0.03% increase) 162.456 → 162.500 → 164.130
docker_agent_amd64 +6.25 KiB (0.00% increase) 277.759 → 277.765 → 279.410
docker_agent_arm64 neutral 265.053 MiB → 267.960
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 neutral 346.405 MiB → 348.040
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 neutral 329.696 MiB → 332.560
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +4.09 KiB (0.01% increase) 67.199 → 67.203 → 68.000
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 +9.98 KiB (0.02% increase) 63.179 → 63.189 → 63.640
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 neutral 2.995 MiB → 3.330
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 neutral 2.726 MiB → 3.090
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 neutral 14.900 MiB → 15.820
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 neutral 14.239 MiB → 14.830
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 neutral 7.854 MiB → 8.790
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 neutral 6.741 MiB → 7.710
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 neutral 7.865 MiB → 8.800
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 neutral 7.865 MiB → 8.800
iot_agent_deb_amd64 neutral 11.239 MiB → 12.040
iot_agent_deb_arm64 neutral 9.601 MiB → 10.450
iot_agent_deb_armhf neutral 9.805 MiB → 10.620
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 neutral 11.257 MiB → 12.060
iot_agent_suse_amd64 neutral 11.257 MiB → 12.060

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link

cit-pr-commenter-54b7da bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 7eb252d9-3697-467a-88e1-42d4eda07438

Baseline: a88881b
Comparison: b774baf
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -2.80 [-5.79, +0.18] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.52 [+0.37, +0.67] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.34 [+0.11, +0.57] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization +0.20 [+0.00, +0.40] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.18 [+0.15, +0.22] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.15 [-0.01, +0.30] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.01 [-1.50, +1.51] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.12, +0.13] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.00 [-0.42, +0.42] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.13, +0.12] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.01 [-0.10, +0.09] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.48, +0.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.42, +0.32] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization -0.06 [-0.29, +0.17] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.07 [-0.11, -0.02] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.16 [-0.21, -0.11] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization -0.17 [-0.22, -0.13] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization -0.23 [-0.28, -0.18] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization -0.31 [-0.50, -0.12] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization -0.33 [-0.41, -0.26] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization -0.34 [-0.43, -0.24] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization -0.53 [-0.59, -0.47] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.81 [-0.89, -0.73] 1 Logs
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization -2.80 [-5.79, +0.18] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs lost_bytes 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

// Set proper ownership and permissions for the file
fullPath := filepath.Join(rootPath, path)
if err := setFileOwnershipAndPermissions(ctx, fullPath, spec); err != nil {
if err := setFileOwnershipAndPermissions(ctx, filepath.Join(root.Name(), path), spec); err != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❓ question
should setFileOwnershipAndPermissions use os.Root instead of filepath.Join ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@clarkb7 I've added a 2nd commit that I hope addresses your comment, esp.:

use os.Root APIs where possible instead of reconstructing full paths at call sites.
root.Chown() is not used as it requires numeric uid/gid: file.Chown() still handles the name lookup internally and requires a full path.

### What does this PR do?
Remove the `rootPath` parameter from `FileOperation.apply()`, replacing
`filepath.Join(rootPath, ...)` calls with
`filepath.Join(root.Name(), ...)`.

### Motivation
Address a trivial TODO, follow-up of #46592: once `root.RemoveAll()`
replaced the last os-level `filepath.Join(rootPath, ...)` call,
`rootPath`'s sole remaining purpose was feeding
`setFileOwnershipAndPermissions`.
`root.Name()` returns the equivalent value.

### Describe how you validated your changes
Existing unit tests pass unchanged.
### What does this PR do?
Pass `*os.Root` into `setFileOwnershipAndPermissions` and use
`root.Chmod()` in place of `os.Chmod()`.

### Motivation
Address review comment in #46719: use `os.Root` APIs where possible
instead of reconstructing full paths at call sites.

`root.Chown()` is not used as it requires numeric uid/gid:
`file.Chown()` still handles the name lookup internally and requires a
full path.

### Describe how you validated your changes
Existing unit tests pass unchanged.
@rdesgroppes rdesgroppes force-pushed the regis.desgroppes/fleet-installer-drop-rootpath-from-apply branch from cf7906d to b774baf Compare February 20, 2026 22:32
@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Feb 20, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor cded3a15:

Results for datadog-agent_7.77.0~devel.git.778.b774baf.pipeline.98033369-1_amd64.deb:

Detected file changes:

1 Removed files:

  • opt/datadog-agent/embedded/lib/libdatadog-agent-rtloader.so.2 (34.0 B)

1 Changed files:

  • opt/datadog-agent/embedded/lib/libdatadog-agent-rtloader.so:
    • Size changed: +13.33% (30.0 B -> 34.0 B)

@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot merged commit 7747810 into main Feb 23, 2026
378 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d bot deleted the regis.desgroppes/fleet-installer-drop-rootpath-from-apply branch February 23, 2026 10:55
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.78.0 milestone Feb 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog internal Identify a non-fork PR medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests team/windows-products

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants